Saul Alvarez vs. Austin Trout RBR

If that fight led you to see Trout had cleaner punching, sue your optometrist.

 

115-112 Canelo :deal

Hes not ready for Money May but will knock the head off Cotto next :deal

 

Another exhibit that you don't know how to score a fight. LOL.
You score fights by round.

 

Close fight either way. Scores were a joke. Open scoring ****ed the match due to it's closeness. Canelo's a ***** for fighting the last round like he did.

 

People are going too far. atsch

 

like i said doesnt matter how many u throw, the punch must land effective to count. trout threw a lot but they did not land effectively and many missed the mark due to canelos superb defense.

canelo on the other hand landed more and they were effective and did more damage. thats why it was easy for me to score this fight

 

Trout landed very few of the jabs while Canelo out-jabbed him at spots. Just trowing the jab hitting air doesn't mean ****. In a close fight Canelo KD him and got a 10-8 round and that was the difference on my card. I had it Canelo by two points. I don't say that Canelo totally dominated him or anything. On a round basis Canelo dominated the fight with his harder more accurate punches and to the general surprise with very good DEFENSE. Punches to the chest are scored those are very damaging blows ask the old school boxers.

 

"Do what you have to do to win" I'm never by hearing that being said about fighters. Alvarez had to stay on his feet to win. He did. Get the **** over it.

 

A punch to the chest is still a punch landing.

 

...:verysad

 

seriously man most people here can't digest the fact that the supposed brawler/pressure fighter showed the better defense that night

 

Canelo landed more? go look at the punchstats you fool

 

lol its not better than a jab to the head though, Alvarez was clearly aiming for the head but missing

 

exactly :yep

 

So Trout out landed Canelo in the punchstats and by alot in jabs but your saying they were missing good one