It seems that ESB scored it a lot better than that one official with that ludicrous scorecard. That fight was super close. I wasn't biased towards either fighter. I sat down with pen and paper and scored each round to the best of my ability. How I had it: Canelo: Trout: 1: 10 9 2: 10 9 3: 10 9 4: 9 10 5: 10 10 6: 9 10 7: 10 9 8: 9 10 9: 10 10 10: 9 10 11: 10 9 12: 9 10 115 115
How could the round 7 be 10-9? Trout got knocked down in that round so the score must be 10-8. You idiot!atsch
Trout came back after the knockdown and did all the connecting after the KD. A knockdown doesn't make an automatic 10-8. I checked the rules and a 10-9 can clearly be established even with the knockdown you ****ing idiot. Learn how to score you moron.
Anyone claiming this was a robbery must've given Trout around 9+ rounds and no way he won that many rounds.
Gotta be a clear "no" for me. Austin threw many punches but missed a lot as well. Canelo landed the harder shots and made his opponents miss. Now, Austin landed more punches total because of his jab but not THAT many more so I'd give a close decision to Canelo myself. Cards were wide but I'm really not impressed by the scoring of armchair judges on various websites either.
1. Canelo 2. Canelo 3. Trout 4. Trout 5. Canelo 6. Trout 7. Canelo 10-8 8. Trout 9. Canelo 10. Trout 11. Trout 12. Trout Trout 114-113 So many close rounds that could have gone either way. I have no problem with Canelo winning.
Maybe to the ones calling it by the official cards, but it was not robbery. the **** was close, but it was clear Canelo won.:bbb