Stats show Trout outlanded Canelo?????????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by papadoc28, Apr 20, 2013.


  1. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    4,623
    1
    Feb 17, 2010
    I don't score rounds simply by who hits harder. I keep it simple. Who gets hit more.
     
  2. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009

    This content is protected
     
  3. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009

    THanks for admitting you dont know how to score a fight :good
     
  4. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    4,623
    1
    Feb 17, 2010
    I went to yahoo sports out of curiosity just see if what I thought was confirmed. And that is where I got the numbers. I felt like Canelo definitely landed the harder blows but Trout still outlanded him overall. The numbers were simply a confirmation of how I thought the fight went down. Nothing more nothing less.
     
  5. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    26,710
    27,689
    Sep 19, 2012
    It was a complete robbery nothing we can do about it now, you could see Oscar the weasel smiling after the fight he knew he had the judges in hand...
     
  6. iamtheman

    iamtheman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,406
    427
    Oct 22, 2010
    Canelo would land a crisp punch at random times, and was defensively impressive. He barely ever looked to counter off of his dodging though. He needs to work on his counter punching ability as a follow up to his defensive skills. If he can do that, he'll give anyone trouble. Which excites me to see him develop his skills since he's still so young. Still, all of that doesn't negate Trouts work rate, landing just as many if not more punches, while remaining the aggressor throughout most of the fight, and showing more effective ring generalship. I could have seen a draw, but not a Canelo UD.
     
  7. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,973
    9,801
    Aug 1, 2012
    it's not that simple though. because if it were that simple then they would just award the winner to the person with the most punch stat landed punches. if it were as simple as just counting punches, then boxers would become rock-em-sock-em robots who just put their head down and repeatedly throw as fast as they can.

    punch stats are not official, all they are is one guy sitting there and guessing (in real time) which ones land and which ones don't. a pawing jab that glances the side of the head is not as good as a well timed hook. one of those weak Trout Jabs that might have grazed Canelo's shoulder when Canelo was ducking out of the way is not equal to the punch that sent Trout down.
     
  8. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,017
    39,461
    Sep 29, 2012
    Lol so much butthurt..... Canelo won, deal with it..
     
  9. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    4,623
    1
    Feb 17, 2010
    Thanks for admitting other people's opinions mean nothing if it doesn't fall in line with your way of thinking.:good

    I bet you believe Williams lost to Margarito in their fight.
     
  10. JoeCamelTow

    JoeCamelTow Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,900
    4
    Dec 27, 2010
    This content is protected



    Compubox stats have already been debunked. Take that gif for example, it's pretty obvious no shot landed but from a different angle a couple of those shots might look like connects and be awarded as such..
     
  11. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    U forgot to mention that canelo had the better percentage in total punches and power punches smh.
     
  12. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    4,623
    1
    Feb 17, 2010
    What you say is true but I'm not going take a few hard punches from one fighter and then completely forget all the shots he ate from his opponent. I'm not talking about all the punches that grazed or were slipped. Screw that. But I saw plenty of clean punches landed and just because I didn't see Canelo's head do a 360 with blood flying into the crowd doesn't mean I'm not counting those shots. That's just my thing.
     
  13. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    This content is protected

    oops wrong thread.
     
  14. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,973
    9,801
    Aug 1, 2012
    exactly, like in that gif, you could give Trout 4 punch stat punches connected if you count the one that Canelo intecepted with his glove. (if you could that as a block, then 3 punches landed) but really none of those punches had any force behind them. if you're just counting the punches landed, and not giving Canelo credit for making him miss all those times, you're missing part of the sweet science. it's like Willie Pepp, who won a round without landing a punch. (because it was so impressive how he made the other guy miss)

    you have to have a cerebral and neutral objective understanding of boxing to make an assessment about a round after it is complete. if you just take that gif in a vacuum, I thought Canelo won that exchange, even though he didn't land a punch, because he was doing something that most boxers can't do, which is evade punch after punch after punch after punch and not take any damage.
     
  15. WildStyle

    WildStyle J.C. Penny's belt $2.99 banned

    8,578
    5
    Sep 24, 2011
    Trout landed more punches, and won more rounds. Deal with it fanboys.