2 different POV's from same website. http://www.boxingnews24.com/2013/04...onight-but-still-wins-controversial-decision/ Trout robbed. http://www.boxingnews24.com/2013/04/no-doubt-that-canelo-defeated-trout/ No doubt Canelo defeated Trout. I had it Canelo by 3-5 points. Rematch.:deal
I agree with the first POV. How the fck does a guy win a fight on the score cards like that when he didnt even throw many punches, Trout was out boxing him and out landing him in MANY rounds. The one judge who scored it 118-109 needs to have his fckn eyes tested.
Same, I had trout up by one... Just shows his class that he said Canelo was a better man, you could see he actually thougt he won.. Stanley Christadulou isa fair dinkum ****wit, he needs to give judging away
Before the decision was announced you could see Oscar the weasel smiling, he knew he had the judges in hand...
Fair enough result, if it was on Trouts turf he might have got it. It will be a robbery if he doesn't get a rematch.
He deserves a rematch - and I do think he just lost (sadly) - but he's a dangerous fighter without a belt or massive pulling power so he's gonna struggle to get big fights. Mayweather is a possibility though ...