Very good or great? Volume 10: Jersey Joe Walcott

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Boxed Ears, Apr 15, 2013.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,982
    27,974
    Feb 15, 2006
  2. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,812
    10,021
    Jul 15, 2008
    Of course he was a great fighter.
     
  3. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,769
    2,349
    Aug 26, 2004
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    Exactly take someoneike Frazier now who's probably between 5-15 on most lists. In 400 years times there could easily be 20 heavyweights who surpass him but that doesn't mean he isn't gonna be a great fighter in 400 years .
     
  5. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    86
    May 30, 2009
    Dehydration and Starvation are both hyperbole. You get the point. Being hungry is worse than drying out any day of the week.

    Foreman did it all the time during his prime. No one seems to bring it up in his case with regards to him being weakened or it affecting his stamina.
     
  6. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    246
    Feb 19, 2012
    Billy Petrolle was as good as Walcott (probably better) and he doesn't get any love as a great fighter.
     
  7. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    553
    Feb 17, 2010
    Petrolle looks like an unimaginative plodder though.Walcott had da sick movez
     
  8. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    246
    Feb 19, 2012
    I can relate. My ex said the same thing about me...
     
  9. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    553
    Feb 17, 2010
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,897
    53,096
    Feb 11, 2005
    I, as almost everyone does, love Walcott's KO of Charles. A shift and hook/uppercut. Devastating stuff and slicker than a 70's pimp.

    However, he tries the same move a few times against Marciano and gets nailed. Well nailed.

    My point is his devotion to slick maneuvers and fancy dance steps was often ineffectual at best, and sometimes costly. Some chose to remember only his successes in this department rather than the sum balance. He was a fighter who fought on the highest level but was inconsistent at times.

    In the end he is still a very good fighter
     
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,477
    Sep 7, 2008
    Very good post indeed.
     
  12. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,745
    3,956
    May 4, 2012
    I think that's why HW is really an exception to this rule. Look at McG's top 100 for instance. It's not fair for HW's to go up against guys like ****in' Armstrong who could weight jump. Even guys like Spinks and Holyfield get the leg up because they did good stuff at the lower weights...

    Against other ATG heavies, though......... he doesn't stack up :bbb
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,982
    27,974
    Feb 15, 2006
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  14. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,463
    2,821
    Aug 26, 2011
    Get a chance to watch that fight yet Luf and Orriray and score it?