Just watched the Alvarez-Trout fight- talk about BIASED commentary

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by megavolt, Apr 21, 2013.

  1. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    28,760
    Likes Received:
    86
    Yeah, this **** about he's biased and they were off. Man people can be anal retentive pricks when it comes to commentators. The commentators were fine. This is not a case of Lampley clearly cheer-leading one guys punches and ignoring the call on the other guys shots. You don't have to agree with their opinion. That's all it was. Why would they be biased toward the non-star anyway? Makes little sense. We all know HBO would've been clamoring all over Alvarez. The funny thing is they all scored it a draw or a point win for Alvarez. That's about what the fight was.

    The 10-9 round idea from Bernstein and Paulie was a bit much, I'll agree with that.
     
  2. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    28,760
    Likes Received:
    86
    I can agree with this. This is natural, it's almost a part of a fighter's psychology to behave this way. Totally understandable, but clearly there was an element of bias there, whether conscious or not.

    Floyd was the same way when he said he thought Cotto beat Trout, or that the fight was a draw or the scorecards were bad or whatever he said that was clear bull****.
     
  3. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    10,075
    Yes I noticed this too about Paulie when talking about Cotto.
     
  4. RazorHandz

    RazorHandz Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Messages:
    4,507
    Likes Received:
    3
    No it was a case of watching Trout throw punches that were mostly blocked and saying things like "another combination from Trout, he's in control".
     
  5. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    22,781
    Likes Received:
    360
    I had the same feeling. Like they were in favor of Trout the whole fight.
     
  6. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    12,331
    Likes Received:
    4
    People came to this fight with their fixed ideas who is the slick boxer and who is the pressure fighter. The roles reversed and some people still can not grasp it.
     
  7. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    28,760
    Likes Received:
    86
    All the while scoring the fight for Canelo. Give it up. They gave Trout props but gave Alvarez the credit.
     
  8. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    31,154
    Likes Received:
    2,111
    Malignaggi tends to overstate sometimes, but I dont think he was biased in favor of Trout. He actually credited both fighters during the fight.

    I do remember Malignaggi stating Trout was walking Canelo down, I was thinking, are you crazy, he's not walking Canelo down, at that point in the fight it was clear to me that Canelo was backstepping trying to walk Trout into a big shot. During this time frame Trout was having difficulties landing a clean shot on Canelo and Paulie called it "walking down." :lol:

    Listen, none of these broadcasters are perfect. I tend to know when a broadcast crew has an agenda, but I did'nt sense that with Showtimes crew last night.
    This was'nt a case of HBO protecting their house fighter, if anything I would think Showtime would have thought to protect and favor Canelo's every move but credit to them, they did'nt.
     
  9. ButtBread

    ButtBread @bettingboxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    630
    Likes Received:
    0
    No. It was him not being good at scoring fights.