according to how suddenly we're scoring fights BHop should have got the nod vs Calzag

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

"I'm not looking for tough fights"
"I know my limitations"

Joe Cal's blueprint to staying undefeated in his own words. Said during his prime.

 

didnt bernard walk back to the wrong corner in this fight?

 

It was the only time he couldn't push the championship rounds, and looked completely out of thoughts, which usually translates to out of breath when one wasted energy trying to get a clue. Tito, Tarver, Palvlik, Cloud, R10-12 was Hopkins territory, but by then the angles and holes disappeared. Calzaghe, who never watched tapes and barely ever sparred for a specific style was a slow adapter vulnerable early, but probably the best in the generation, demonstrated here. He gets little credit for taking Hops' best shots away, most still think he was nothing but a slapper. His science was too sweet I guess.

 

Yeah I was thinking the same thing. A lot of Trout fans are also Hopkins fans but they had no problem scoring Hopkins/Calzaghe for Hopkins even though he got outlanded. They change their scoring method depending on who they support.

 

Joe was way too slick for Hopkins. Total beatdown.

 

i had it for b-hop in a close one so cant argue the decision. they both looked like **** in the fight cause of each others styles... it was a terrible fight

 

I'm black, I scored Calzaghe/Hop for Calzaghe,
I scored Trout/Canelo for Trout for the same reason.
I actually gave Canelo one more round than Hop. Only
gave Nard 4 rounds. Everyone on the site isn't this way.
alot are though

 

I had Calzaghe winning that fight. I scored it twice.

 

you must have picked trout to beat canelo, lol.

 

OPie still whining!