Mike Tyson unified the division,defeating every belt holder consecutively by himself while losing maybe 2 rounds in the process. Wladimir always had big bro to help him. Tyson beat tons of heavyweight champions and top fighters. He even beat some while after his real prime and guess what,he had no older brother to help him make slave contracts,intimidate guys or fight the tougher stylistic fights for him.
Lewis wins over Mercer,Tucker are meaningless. Mercer was old and past his prime and was robbed of the win. Tucker was barely beaten and was old,overweight and had returned to boxing after being our for drugs. The Lewis-Tucker fight was close on the cards right? This being a Tucker 15 pounds over his prime weight. And no Holyfield was not still elite when Lewis chose to cherrypick him. Holyfield had previously struggled with a bum named Vaugh Bean. Lewis even remarked that Holyfield "looked like a has been." So knowing Holyfield was fading,Lewis chose to fight him.
According to your imbecile logic Buster Douglas > Wlad and Shannon Briggs > Wlad. You're so dumb it hurts.
Wlad's best win is a 12 RD jab-fest decision against David Haye in which he barely hit and never hurt his much smaller opponent even once. Tyson was an ATG beast.
Wrong. Haye is nothing special on Wlad's resume. His two wins over Byrd (who demolished Vitali) are obviously much stronger.
Wrong. At 21 Chris Byrd was a MW. He was dog **** as a HW. He fought Wlad a year after being very badly exposed and KO'd by Ibeabuchi. Byrd only won against Vitali cos the big man quit on his stool like a punk *****. Byrd beat exactly who? Solid contender David Tua who was practically coming off a loss? Past-prime Holyfield who just lost and drew with John ****in Ruiz? Who? Byrd was **** and lost every time he fought a good HW. Stop pretending he was anybody. If Lennox had agreed to fight Byrd in 2000 you'd call it the worst matchup of all time. Haye is by far Wlad's best win. By far.