Fair enough man, I never really noticed it but the thought of murdering Craney takes up most of my brain power so I'm not surprised. (Only joking Craney you ain't worth the time).
Cool :good Shame the Brook-Alexander fight is off so we can't see which one of us had it right. Hopefully, it will happen along the line.
Of course it makes it a difference. If you have spoken to Hearn that implies a very different relationship to a written correspondence.
Perhaps 20 years ago. But theres this thing called the internet and email. kind of chaned the way people communicate. :good
Its made written communication easier, but lets not pretend its the same as verbal communication, as you did.
That's your opinion and you are entitled to it but your from a different generation to the two people having the conversation. I wouldn't expect you to understand.
Eddie Hearns in his mid 30s like me. And my generation still believe writing and talking are two different things.
Ok. I was stating that I am not Pro Hearn to people on a boxing forum, and the example I gave was that I have been critical of him, by writing negative comments on this forum, and when I spoke to him, in writing, I was also very critical of him. How does whether the conversation was written or over the phone, or in person undermine what I was trying to say?
USA Rob, it does not undermine it one bit. You statedyou had spoken to Hearn, 'one on one', this was done to big up your own self importance, it was misleading and a lie.