Before Charr was a bum, now it's suddenly a good fight v Haye?

Vitali is supposed to be World Champion. He isnt of course, but he is supposed to be...

 

Theres a difference between a guy getting a shot at a legitimate world title, and being picked by a guy whos fought once in 2 years

 

'When You Beat a Legend, You Become a Legend'

Manuel Charr > Danny Williams > Mike Tyson :yep

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Charr was a bum, till he proved himself with his valiant effort against Vitali.

 

It's a good fight because Charr will be aggressive and is quite durable which will make for good viewing. It will also set up Haye Vs Vitali nicely as Haye would of beaten two of the same fighters as Vitali.

 

Still can't believe people are ******ed enough to question matchmaking in a dead division. Who else should he fight?, Wilder?, Fury?lol

 

Exactly.



Also, I don't believe anyone is predicting a Charr win, though he will certainly come to fight. Don't expect the overweight, lackadaisical Charr that fought Saglam. Expect the dynamo that forced Vitali to cheat his way out of the battle.

I think Haye is too fast / slick for Charr, but if Haye wants to win by KO & not by running and potshotting all night, then Charr is gonna' make him work really hard for it.

 

That's supposed to be a good thing??

 

I think Haye is a pretty good opponent for Charr, have no problems with him picking the former WBA beltholder. :bart

 

Charr is the WBC Silver Belt holder and Arabic, Mediterranean and North African WBC champion. Haye should be happy he was able to sign a high-profile opponent with four belts:

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

cause Haye is, well, toetally toeriffic:rofl:rofl

 

What did he actually do in that fight? He was abysmal.

Chisora was meant to be durable too. I see it ending within 6.

Sarcasm? He was awful against Vitali. About as dynamic as walking hot dog.

 

Your DKSAB-nes is staggering.

 

You DKSAS(pelling)