***The Malik Scott Appreciation, Hype & Discussion Thread!!***

I'm straight mate but I appreciate the sentiment and I'm genuinely flattered. There sure is a lot of man love in this thread!

[yt]CS9OO0S5w2k[/yt]
[yt]AO43p2Wqc08[/yt]
[yt]InBXu-iY7cw[/yt]


I think the OP is doing a great thing here with his unwavering infatuation with Malik Scott. Out and proud buddy, out and proud!

 

You actually took time out of your day to post Village People videos on a boxing forum? You must have had those on bookmark for quick access. atsch

 

Look if he wants to be a career sparring partner, fine. He can hang out on the gym with his other no hoper crewmembers Joe Hanks, Deontay Wilder, and whoever else there is. Scott, and his fanboys should stop pretending he's anything else than that, and certainly stop pretending he's some top HW.

You say all this experience is going to add wins when he steps up the ring. Exactly when is that gonna happen???? The guy turned pro at 19 or so, been a pro for 13 years and doesn't have a damn name on his resume. He looks like he's in good shape, yet he's pissed all those years away fighting scrubs. Hell even pillow-fisted Zuri Lawrence's resume shits all over Scott's.

Why should he press the action??? Seriously?? Oh I don't know, maybe so he can win a fight impressively when he got his shot on a major TV network. Maybe because boxing is scored on clean punching, ring generalship, defense and effective aggression. Anyone who knows boxing knows that judges rarely reward fighters that back up all night against the ropes with a decision win. Of course you thought Scott won, you're a fanboy and not a professional boxing judge. Of course it's Scott's fault he got a draw, he should have done more. He impressed only 1 out of the 3 judges. If he's not going to adjust his style, his gameplan.....he's not going anywhere and he shouldn't expect judges to change the scoring criteria for him.

Sure it's fine that he takes pictures, but the fact that none of them of him IN the ring doing anything and more about just being pretentious in nature should speak for itself. If he's not going to take his career seriously, why should anyone else.

You still didn't answer my question about what K2 has to do with this, so I'll just take it that I hurt your feelings having gone after Malik Scott with valid points, so you felt the need to go after some of my favorite fighter with no actual basis other than butthurt. That's ok, have a cry, let it out.....pick yourself up and move on.

 

Nah sorry, got the Blue Oyster Bar scene from Police Academy though, check it out. You'll like High Tower!
[yt]tTJMerul33E[/yt]

 

Malik outworked and exposed Glaskov as being one dimensional and was robbed of a victory. They need to have a rematch.

 

Scott is a skilled heavyweight, but lacks bad of power, In order to be a strong heavyweight contender you need at least abit of power. Scott just seems to have no power at all. Glazkov could walk him down all the time and could get him on the ropes many many times. Yet Scott has impressiv defense skills (the biggest part in his game for me). Glazkov was just not able to land anything big although he had Scott on the ropes many times.
But be aware that other heavyweight will find a way to land a big shot. And other heavyweights also have a lot more power than Glazkov has who really is not a big puncher himself.
Also dont rate the win over Glazkov so high. I predicted a close fight and at the end it was a competitive fight. Scott won! But he did not "school" Glazkov!

 

What is so hard to understand about the fact that he 'stepped up' against Glazkov? That was by far the best opponent he has fought to date. Glazkov is a good prospect, and it was a good 'win' for Scott. It's only forward from here. So how about waiting until the announcement of his next opponent before talking ****?

If you'd ask most, they'd agree he won. You are in the minority. You claim effective aggression? Well I claim ineffective aggression on Glazkov's part. When you are making your opponent miss all night and hitting with ease, I'd say that is enough to score a fight in favour of Scott. He didn't do enough to win because he got robbed, not because he didn't do work in the ring. Again, he wasn't at fault. The judges were.

When a man taking pics of himself bothers you, it's obvious you're just a full blown hater. It's no different from people on facebook posting pics of themselves. Big ****ing deal? He has a phone with a camera. Hold it up, snap, upload to the internet. Done. You seem to think a boxers life is exclusively boxing. These guys have a life outside of the ring, even with Scott's intense work ethic. I guess all athletes should decide to not embrace social media and connect with their fans through pics and whatever else. After all, they aren't normal humans like anyone else??? You think he doesn't take his career seriously with the work he puts in, combined with his recent showing against his best opponent yet? And you claim to make valid points? :rofl

I attack K2 because you are a fanboy and probably feel the need to attack Scott based on some suggestions that he may pose a threat to Wlad. Besides, is it not true that Wlad and Vitali fight bum after bum? You attack Scott, yet as a prospect he is on the rise. K2 as champions are a disgrace with the opponents they've been selecting. I brought that up because I find it ironic. You probably keep your mouth shut about K2, don't you?

 

You are full out deluded. I understand perfectly that he stepped up against Glazkov. I am saying that after 13 years of being a pro, it's a joke that Glazkov was considered a "step-up". Again, you show your severely limited reading comprehension skills. Scott has been a pro 13 years! He's not a prospect anymore.

2 out of 3 judges were wrong? :nut Yeah ok, whatever These people score fights on a monthly basis, for years on end. You sit on your couch with rose-tinted glasses on and don't even understand the criteria on which rounds are scored are. Yeah you're right, the professional are wrong. You can claim ineffective agression on Glazkov's part if you want, and it's not exactly an incorrect assesment. That's why Glazkov got a draw on his record also instead of a win.

Scott is not the same as "people on facebook posting pics of themselves". He's supposedly a professional athlete, not a 15 yr old wannabe gangster. Most serious athletes, sure they post pictures of themselves having a social life, enjoying things, etc.....but they also post pictures of themselves showcasing their athletic abilities, actually performing their occupation. I guess you're too enamored by the wannabe gangster charade to understand this. Hell even jokes of fighters like Chauncy Welliver posted pics of himself in the ring FIGHTING.

I'm glad you confirm my suggestion that you only bring up Wlad because you're butthurt over me criticizing Scott. I got you pegged. Scott poses no threat to Wlad, he has no power to hurt him and leaning back on the ropes all night would just be target practice for Wlad. If Wlad fought Scott, it would be another zero opponent. I couldn't really give a **** what you think of K2. They have all the titles, have had them for many years now and there isn't a damn person that can do anything about that, certainly not Scott. Go cry some more :|:|:|

 

Gayest. Thread. Ever.

 

Get out of this thread.

 

This content is protected

 

at this point....malik scott is THEE most skilled heavyweight in boxing. period.