How good is JMM's resume?

Let's put his fight record under ESB's microscope.

This guy hasn't beaten anyone worth of mention before losing to Norwood. Got his first world title by beating Gainer who barely beat Leon. That fight was so close it could have went either way, I scored it a draw by the way. Then fought Pacquioa and luckily escaped with a draw. Seriously, how can anyone score that fight 115-110 in favor of Marquez? Ducked Pacquioa after. Lost to John. Won over Barrera, when I thought he lost. Lost to Pacquioa again. Both guys went different paths. Looked boring in the first 10 rounds against a way past prime Casamayor. Won over feather-fisted Diaz who is coming off a loss against Campbell and a split-decision win against Katsidis who just lost to Casamayor by a stoppage. And Diaz gave him fits. Lost to Mayweather by a shut-out. Then fought Diaz again who is coming of a loss against Malignaggi. Fought Katsidis who already lost to his victims. Fought an unknown Likar Ramos. And lost to Pacquioa again. The only version of Pacquioa he has beaten is the faded one who lost to Bradley. And it was a fluke. He got lucky Pacquioa got tripped and free fall into his punch. It could have been anybody. And he's fighting Bradley next when we all know that Bradley himself is coming off two controversial wins.

What does ESB think?

 

:nutcase

 

We think youre a daft c*nt

 

And that is how a guy with 18k of posts replies. Ladies and gentlemen, a true sign of maturity. :-(

 

**** sandwich.

 

Yeah because ESB people enjoys bashing MP's and praising JMM's and PBF's. Double standard.

 

:hop

 

This content is protected

 

I think if you think Barrera beat Marquez you probably should set aside your blood relation to Barrera.

 

So that gif is what makes JMM's resume so good? He had 36 rounds and a couple of years to pull that one out and I'm sorry to tell you, it was a fluke.

This content is protected

As you can see, Pacquioa's right foot is tripped accidentally by the left foot of Marquez. Pacquioa was falling because of his momentum, and he got hit. Definitely, a fluke. You could put anyone there and they would knock out Pacquioa given the same exact scenario.

 

So can you tell me that wasn't close, and tell yourself your not lying?

 

It was more a competitive fight than it was close.

 

Uh oh, it's that time again!

So what's up with all of Manny's other victories? Exponential flukes?

 

Yeah because Marquez did knock out Pacquioa in the fifth. Because he really land that shot the whole fight right? :? I guess in your eyes, he was really winning the fight.

Marquez won't come up on top if he had taken the path Pacquioa took. Imagine Marquez against dela Hoya, Hatton, Cotto, Margarito. Even old Mosley would beat him back then. And don't tell me Pacquioa wouldn't beat a single name in Marquez' resume. He will beat them all.

 

such a keen observation for someone with only 25 posts. Unless *omg* you're an alias.