George Foreman suffered badly due to the 'catchweight' syndrome of the 70's

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bigbootyboxing, May 3, 2013.


  1. Foreman had the natural frame+size of a 6'4 240 pound super heavy.

    But due to the 70's fighters all coming in so light.. Foreman was literally drained at 225ish... Guy had the perfect style to just come forward and knock you out. A 240 pound YOUNG Foreman would be unbeatable.


    Foreman actually was already 230 pounds at age 19(all muscles too, heavier than Lewis-Wlad-Vitali-Bowe at 19) but was told to lose the weight because they wanted a lighter version. Foreman never really benefited from being that light.. He is a 6'3 1/2-6'4 240 slugger... draining him down to 225 is suicide.

    Pointing to how he was fat during the 90's is idiotic.. He was in his 40's.. but he could have easily carried 240+ in his 20's.. the difference being that would have been fighting muscles instead of blubber....
     
  2. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,106
    4,600
    Mar 8, 2008
  3. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    8,710
    27
    Jun 1, 2012
    "Foreman actually was already 230 pounds at age 19"

    Can you proof this statement?
     
  4. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010

    Very true. But I don't KNOW if the extra weight woulda changed any of his results.

    Would he have been better prepared to not punch himself out vs Ali if he had KOd Frazier any faster??????:think:think:think

    But it coulda had a little effect on his mental health.:think
     
  5. SUGAR J

    SUGAR J P4P KING Full Member

    2,052
    1
    May 10, 2011
    How is it catch weight, he fough heavyweights, he was heavier than most, he was a great fighter only lost to Ali first time round.
     
  6. Shawn Kemp

    Shawn Kemp Guest

    I do agree that losing weight affected Foreman but not so much as he only had 2 loses in his prime. And I could try to find the article that showed Foreman being 6 foot 3 and 1/2 and weighing 230 ish range.

    Some fights he came in as low as 212. Why dehydrate yourself out when you are heavyweight and a heavyweight who was already big and musclar
     
  7. RonnieHornschuh

    RonnieHornschuh ESB indie police Full Member

    6,024
    17
    Mar 21, 2007
    Bull****: Foreman was 235 in his comeback when he fought Qawi. So you are trying to say that he weighed the same at 19 and 39 even though he visible bulked up for his second career? The truth is Foreman just wasn't that big in the 70s.
     
  8. Derrick_Rose

    Derrick_Rose Guest

    Past prime Ali wouldve danced circles around a 240 pound Foreman. His hands and feet were already slow at 225.
     
  9. Hercegovac

    Hercegovac Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,583
    98
    Oct 19, 2010
    idk about that bro, foreman wasnt particularly cut at 225, he'd look fat as **** at 240

    This content is protected


    Hes about 26 or 27 years old here, and to tell the truth a bit pudgy. Wlad at 249 is way more shredded than him at 225
     
  10. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    Tis a story of the frigid variety, male sibling.
     
  11. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    There's no telling how much Foreman weighs in this picture though. This could have been taken between fights when Foreman wasn't actively training, so his weight could have been up. And Foreman wasn't a bodybuilder that cared about having big muscles and a six-pack set of abs. He was a naturally trained athlete who I don't believe did much weight training at all during the 70s.
     
  12. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    A 6'3" 220-pound man is big in any era. But of course when you compare someone like Foreman to Hulk Hogan or Andre the Giant then they are not big. But I guess it's all relative.
     
  13. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    Just food for thought: Foreman in his 40s was probably physically stronger than he was in his 20s. And when I say physically stronger, I mean in terms of pure brute physical strength -- not in terms of punching power. I think Foreman did a lot more strength training types of exercises during his comeback than he did in career 1; plus, he didn't restrict his diet as severely.
     
  14. Hercegovac

    Hercegovac Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,583
    98
    Oct 19, 2010
    Believe it or not, a man is at his strongest from his mid to late 30s.

    Im talking about strength here, not speed, reflexes, stamina, or whatever, but brute strength.
     
  15. The Spider

    The Spider Guest

    Your comments are probably on the money :good