Does anyone have anything bad to say about DLH, Or was he perfect??

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TheSouthpaw, May 3, 2013.

  1. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    14,678
    Likes Received:
    186
    :lol:

    You've already got a supply of the sperm then:D
     
  2. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,942
    Likes Received:
    62

    Thats true turbo there was a size diufference.
     
  3. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,942
    Likes Received:
    62
    DLH is top 10..not top 100..period
     
  4. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    10,305
    Likes Received:
    553
    That doesn't even make sense
     
  5. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,942
    Likes Received:
    62
    What I mean is I would put him in the top 10 of ATG's not a top 100 list of ATG's.....I reank DLH very high.:nut
     
  6. DigMona

    DigMona Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    He looks good in high heels and fish nets.
     
  7. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,942
    Likes Received:
    62

    :good
     
  8. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    34,796
    Likes Received:
    66
    he was unique because he fought well at 147, but at 140 his left hook was paralyzing and at 147 it was good but not near as great. Hearns found a similar problem moving up to middlweight and light heavyweight. Punches which stopped guys at 147 and 154 didn't do the same thing.
     
  9. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    34,796
    Likes Received:
    66
    Yeah they were bigger, and to think Oscar fought all the way up to 160 and in my mind gave Bernard a better fight than Tito did since he did win some of the rounds, although a different style. Tito held the weight better but was slower, and Oscar was faster so he could win some rounds with Bernard slowly landing some big punches and coming to the body.
     
  10. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,942
    Likes Received:
    62

    Your right Oscar was faster!:yep
     
  11. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,942
    Likes Received:
    62
    Who besides Mayweather was faster than De la Hoya!?
     
  12. Shawn Kemp

    Shawn Kemp Guest

    De La Hoya was great at beating up Mexicans and the getting beat by black fighters. To bad he never faced Vernon Forrest or he never had to fight guys like Tommy Hearns or Julian Jackson.
     
  13. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    10,744
    Likes Received:
    81
    :rofl
     
  14. sportofkings

    sportofkings Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    12,368
    Likes Received:
    24
    Didnt delopv a right hand till late in his career, had the tendency to switch off for parts of fights. Fairly stiff to, didnt have great upper body movement.

    Can't criticize the guy for his level of competition, he fought everyone he should of and much more. If every fighter was like him boxing would be all the better for it.
     
  15. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,942
    Likes Received:
    62

    Your absolutely right!