Manny Pacquiao still wants Floyd Mayweather fight - Agrees to testing and 60%-40%

Why was blood testing requested when Pacquiao became a possible opponent?, why wasn't Marquez tested prior to that? Fact is, Mayweather was in no position to play the commission and introduce a new set of rules for one fight, especially when Pacquiao was P4P#1 at the time and THE main man in boxing. If he bowed down to Mayweather's demands what kind of image would he leave to rising stars? You guys don't even have **** for brains to comprehend and look into the topic in depth as it's supposed to be. "AWww Mayweather demands testz Pac says no, he duckin'n'dodgin". Get a clue and relive the events in 2010 because, I hope for your sake you know, it was nothing like 2013.

 

- Clottey coming off a 50/50 fight with Cotto with many scoring it for Clottey. Pointless?, sure. I never find it shocking how people discuss fights that already happened like they knew what was going to happen back then anyway.

- Concreto never deserved the shot especially after the cheating scandal. The P4P#1 fighter shouldn't have given a scumbag a shot and I fully agree here that he's a pointless fight. However, Pacquiao moved up to light middleweight for it and was totally undersized, that can't be denied.

 

Was the same exact procedure requested previously?, if so, please enlighten me with reliable information.

 

I had the first two fights for Pacquiao, third fight for Marquez and fourth obviously for Marquez. Planet earth or boxing for that matter doesn't revolve around your opinion nor mine unless we're 15 years old, so don't act like it does. Many people had different thoughts and views on all three fights and it's hard to argue otherwise when they're all 50/50 fights.

 

I was owned?, by who? As far as I remember almost everyone resorted to personal insults and attacks as discussions regarding this subject went further. "Mayweather demands almost everything as he so desires facing the #1 P4P fighter and we think he's right on spot!". If you call that being "owned" then you're a ****.

 

By who then?, and was it similar to what Mayweather is requesting?

 

- 150 is still junior middleweight. Whether you approve or not is your problem.

- I'm not here to assess Clottey's career. Was he coming off a 50/50 fight with Cotto or not?, didn't Pacquiao fight Cotto and got **** for not fighting the "real" winner by many fans? Of course your answers will be "no".

- Oh please, don't even dare bring up the Guerrero fight. I've been telling you nutheads this will be a sparring session as I did the Ortiz fight and got **** on for it as usual. Surely no one will remember I said that only one day ago and all the way to as soon as the fight was announced. It was a sparring session and a joke fight. This was Guerrero's third fight at welterweight with his biggest win to date being Berto. Clottey beat Judah and gave Cotto hell, Clottey is a FAR better opponent for Pacquiao in 2010 than Guerrero for Mayweather today.

 

Your whole point is your opinion, I'm asking you did ANY fighter in history request the same testing procedures Mayweather has introduced? Answer my question.

Regarding your "point". Mayweather's request came with insults, jealous traits and extremely low comments regarding Pacquiao and his entire career. He was almost dragged to court for it since none of his allegations were proven by anything and publicly apologized for them. That's where his demands came from and it's sickening to see fans back that up with a straight face. I've been a Mayweather fan openly on these boards since 2003, I assure you I know when to back a fighter's actions and when to say "hold on, this is bull****". You need to learn to do the same. Being a fan doesn't necessarily make as one dimensional as an average man's ***** on desperate weekends.