how does Mayweathers refusal to take the real challenges impact his legacy?

Guerrero hadn't lost in 8 years. An even older, slower and shotter Mosley than Floyd fought is a better fight? A broken Hatton was a better fight? Clottey had lost his last fight and the *******s thought that was a "brave challege" against a top WW :rofl


Pacquiao can take far worse fights and get less flak. Now that he get KTFO by a lightweight be can take even crappier fights.

 

So Shane was shot to ****? Past his best but he wasn't shot in early 2010.

 

Guerrero's resume is pathetic for a "4 weight champ". What's his 2nd best win, a washed up Kats or running out the clock on bum ass Aydin? Guerrero Karass is a competitive fight, tough to call.

 

Mosely yes though vastly bigger than Pac (something he wasnt against May), Hatton wasn't blown up and back at his optimum fighting weight, he was also a lot bigger than Pac, so Pacs destruction of Hatton was much better than the controversial win May who was much bigger than had over a blown up Hatton.

Clotterly also much bigger than Pac and coming off a fight that would have given him confidence, the ''loss'' you mention against Cotto who was dominating people, a fight in which many people thought Clott won.

May not only fights bums, but he fights bums who he is bigger than, he fought Cotto, a ruined Cotto who still gave him hell, hence why Cotto was sandwiched between 2 bums and May won't make that mistake again.

JMM is also bigger than Pac, it was also a hal mary in a fight Pac was dominating, and on top of that, Marqueerz was clearly roided to the eyeballs.

I half think Pac even threw the fight to lure Mayweather into thinking he is shot, hence why Pac is calling him out again.

 

Man you are one deluded ****!

 

Dumbest post ever on any boxing forum ever.

 

These are facts, aside from the final part which is logical assumption.

You aren't even eloquent enough to say that in a manner that would be insulting, probably due to your lack of breeding:deal

 

Robinson lost to the heat, he was well ahead on points when he retired in that fight. (round 11 I think, not sure).

Hagler would have broken up Floyd IMO.

 

Facts are something you can actually prove you dip****. Half your post was deluded BS.

Embrace that and then get back to me:smooch

 

It's been proven, stated and you can't argue otherwise, either because you're too limited or because you have no counter which basically supports what I said, facts :smooch:hi:

 

We're back to square one. Find out what facts are and then get back to me.:hi:

Then maybe we can discuss your cute theory about Pac losing to JMM on purpose

 

This was a good post right up until the last line.

 

As you overlooked everything I said, I will skip to the last part.

pac's line of thinking is probably looking at Floyds opponents criteria, now he knows Floyd won't believe he is slow, so he can't feign that. Floyd likes to pick on smaller men, tick 1. Floyd likes to fight people that look shot...how does Pac present himself that way? get Ko'ed, he didn't even look like the punch hurt him after, infact the next day you'd have said Marqueerz was hit by a truck and Pac cut himself while shaving. Pac didn't KO Bradley when he could have, he stayed off Moseley too, because he learned Ko'ing and obliterating common opponents between him and Floyd is counter productive.
Pac saw the video of Floyd in a tantrum when talking about him, he saw Floyd highlight how Pac was knocking everyone out, punches werent hurting him, how he is walking through people and would never fight him. So Pac becomes the opposite of what Floyd's fear was.

Also lose to a guy you beat convincingly 3 times already, doesn't damage your legacy, to get a guy that can cement top 10 ATG status.

I extrapolated this scenario based on these events. It isn't fact, but logical that Pac is possibly playing possum to lure Floyd into what he thinks is a winnable fight.

 

Cute story. Specially the part about Pac winning the first 3 fights convincingly.:good