like i said and Booth confirmed in an interview... Haye had the contract... they wanted to fight Chisora first... vitali said "No" sign the contract... haye didnt and went on to fight Chisora.... not a duck but a decision team haye made... Vitali went in a different direction also. now haye wants the fight again when he had the chance before and Vitali is DONE dealing with the BS of haye saying "i want the fight" go through all the talks and costs of contracts made and then Haye goes in a different direction....... its not a duck and everyone know it FIGHTING NEWS
the source is Chef. In case you dont know he is a member of Wlads camp and not only posts on these boards, but has posted in this thread :deal
didnt Fury said himself that he was not happy with the money? I remember that he said something like this in an interview...
fury himself said he turned down a fight... funny thing was team Klitschko never even got that far.......:yep fury's team said 'not yet"... just like what happened with Haye Haye has stated "fury talks smack but his team says no"...... same thing as with wlad
i dont know. but using money as an excuse not to fight a guy with about 10 belts that you have told the world you can easily beat doesnt make much sense to me
It even could be that Fury never gets a shot. If he just wants to be mandatory it could be very hard. Pulev will beat Fury in my opinion. Lets see maybe team Fury is looking to duck Pulev like Adamek did.
can you imagine Mike Tyson calling out any of the champions as he was a top 10 contender and Trevor Berbick saying ok Mike, we will fight you....and Tyson saying "We can kick your ass, but the money aint quite right, thanks anyway for the title shot offer". **** no, he did what you are supposed to do, go in fight the champ as a challenger and wreck his ass and the money will come. Mike Tyson wanted the title of heavyweight champion first, money came soon after that , big money that is
Haye said he signed a contract in november at the Vitali/Chisora press conference Boente blatantly ducked the question live on tv lmao said if he fought chisora he would get vitali.... No doubt chef will tell us otherwise and what we saw was an illusion
I'm no huge fan of Wladdy. I prefer Vitali to him. But you just can't call him a disgrace. You can talk about what you want as far as his style of fighting, etc. But he comes to fight in shape every time and he takes his craft seriously. Plus, he seems like an all-around good guy. His past couple of opponents have been pretty dismal though.
If he doesn't want the shot why is he fighting trough eliminators to get there. K2 offered a **** , slave contract knowing he could not accept it. Holding all the belts, its Wlads responsibility to boxing and fans to fight top contenders. It was all K2's choice to fight Piaenta and not Povlektin. He could of had that fight then Pulev after. The only reason high ranked guys have to fight so many eliminators is because K2 make it that way so they dont have to fight them.
I agree-this was on live tv saying he signed a contract and sent it over Vitali and Boente ducked and talked over him, then said Chisora, which he did. So you can infer Haye was bs but there is proof, Haye never chose Chisora over Vit, they wouldnt sign a contract then said he had to fight Chisora-which he did. Both camps have been guilty of the whole Haye/Wlad saga but this time its more on them i think
Yeah the sanctioning bodies have nothing to do with it, K2 runs boxing right? atsch So by your logic, Fury should be instated as a mandatory per your word? And WK should be obligated to offer 50/50, no rematch clause, fight where Fury chooses? Take your whining elsewhere...