It was an interesting experience. I don't think boxing necessarily lends it self well to a movie theater setting. It's not the right format. If you're a person that likes to get up and eat in between fights, etc. It may not the best alternative. Of course you can get up and go get movie theater food but I try to stay away from eating that crap. Sometimes big fights have huge gaps between the fights but luckily this wasn't the case for this fight but I can imagine it happening, making the experience a little more irksome. But it's worth the price, and the quality was better than I anticipated. It's HD on a huge screen, basically. Was definitely a worthwhile way to see the fight.
I went with my boys... I paid 18 bucks! I showed up drunk... Enjoyed a good night of fights! The *****s were hella cool... Was talking some boxing with the Floyd Fanatics.. They don't mouth off in person like that Ho Rudyard does on ESB... In fact the poster Rudyard was probably their.. He was soft spoken in person! He's not hard like he is on the net... That ***** likes to get wild on the net!
A movie joint with no surround sound in 2013?! Where the fvck do you live because I'm staying far from there?! lol
Im not saying that they dont have it but they just didnt use it. IDK if they didnt think they needed it since it wasnt a movie but I saw Floyd vs Ortiz and it was awesome. Then I saw Floyd vs Cotto or some fight and the only speakers that worked were the one's coming from the screen. It was night & day compared to the Ortiz fight and I couldnt enjoy it. You could still clearly hear it but it wasnt the same
:deal The Mayweather/Guerrero fight, the sound just came from the center speakers which sucked. I hate that depending on the management at some theaters they can choose how to show their "movie". Mayweather/Ortiz and Mayweather/Cotto had beautiful surround sound and then this one just didn't. atsch