i see why burns didnt wanna fight broner.

Broner is too much for burns

 

How is Burns a Hype job ? there's nobody over here going crazy about Ricky Burns he virtually gets no hype what so ever.

I think day 1 Burns fans even think Broner would beat him.

 

This seems like the case. I like Burns, but he didn't show much in that fight.

 

Everybody that was put in front of him.

 

:nono He lost to Ponce

 

Broener would have beat the snot out of that bum. But, Burns missed his biggest payday op.

 

Yeah because Broner has the movement to make Burns struggle the way Gonzalez does. Gonzalez was more like Vazquez than Broner

 

I think Burns has the style to give Broner a lot of trouble. Considering the fact that he'd probably be a considerable underdog, I'd put my money on Burns.

I'll still be pissed if he doesn't rematch gonzalez though (who I would confidently pick against Broner).

 

And Quintero.

 

:good

They must think Burns has a poor defence like DeMarco or would be silly enough to stand in the pocket all night

:deal

 

Who has Burns beat again? Broner would have put a demolition job on that bum.:deal Burns knew it and turned Broner down accordingly.

 

Demarco would probably beat Broner. As would Escobedo. Burns is not a good fighter. Certainly not the caliber of a Broner.,

 

Please explain what about Burns style gives Broner trouble? His **** defense that would see Broner land left hooks at will? ARe you you banking that Broner breaks his wrist punching Burns in the face so many times as well?

 

Burns can't handle Broner's speed and power. He would be frozen by it. He would get worn down and beat up and get stopped in 7 rounds or less. It would be a complete demolition job if you thought Broner-Demarco was an ass kicking Broner-Burns would be 2x worse.:deal