The fall and fall of Australia's own daniel geale

:verysad Poor old Prowler must be upset at getting his account banned for being a giant homosexual. Have you picked up the medication for your ADD and butthurt?

 

Golovkin KTFO Geale.

 

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz:|

 

more trolling.

 

yup he ducked GGG i admit it....but he made 2 million cash dude..even GGG manager said it was a no brainer...plus knowing tony abott is going to win the election and totally **** up this country i would do the same..FAMILY FIRST..!

 

get ****ed Gillard turned this country into a laughing stock atsch

 

who's laughing at us?5% unemployment lowest interest rates in years..
you bloody gonzo...atsch

 

:rofl:roflatsch It was handed to them on a silver platter by the Howard government, junkie. If you actually finished high school, you would understand this. When Labor came into power in 2007:

- Unemployment: under 6% (11% when Liberals took over in 1996)
- Interest rates: a little over 6% (16% when Liberals took over in 1996)
- 23 Billion Dollars in the bank/surplus (56 billion dollar deficit when Liberals took over in 1996)
- ZERO Debt (96 BILLION in debt when Liberals took over in 1996)
- Border Protection had prevented hundreds to thousands of possible deaths with only three boats a year from 2003 to 2007.

I can see why you would support the current government. That $900 cheque must have instantly sprung "free drugs for a month!!!" into your head. Did you save your dole cheques during that time or did you just chuck it all at the dealer?

 

Righto alan jones. They will be ****ed this time as they sold everything off last time around!

 

Canelo Gillard KO1 Tony SOG Abbott

 

Instead of countering the facts I posted, you resort to name calling like a typical leftard. Where else were they going to get the money from seeing as LABOR spent it all and left the country in a **** heap?

 

:rofl:rofl:roflatsch nice copy and paste job from your local union brochure.

Myth #1: Howard froze pensions.

No, moron. They rose just under 5% (whilst paying off 96 billion dollars of debt and trying to get unemployment under 8% that was inherited from the Hawke/Keating government) which is pretty damn good considering the country was in the **** for the first 4-5 years of his reign. In comparison, the Hawke government rose them by 4% which was in a better financial position than the Howard government at the time.

Myth #2: Howard did nothing for education in Australia and was unfair to public schools.

Howard introduced a system where increased school funding was based on performance which is the sensible thing to do seeing as in previous years under the Labor government, under-performing school that mainly consisted of public schools were given the largest percentage of funding and were achieving **** all. Literacy rates proves this as PISA found in 2005 that Australia had statistically the second highest literacy rate among each age group behind only Finland , as compared to being ranked 6th prior to the adoption of Howards system. Benchmark internationally prior to the Howard system? LOL pull your head out of your arse.

I'll put it in more simple terms for you: this meant that schools who were receiving funding but weren't achieving results would no longer be allowed to do so whereas schools who were achieving results would receive extra funding. Nothing wrong with that as it ensured lazy bludging schools like Granville High School would not receive more funding than James Ruse Argricultural High School (which was the case prior to Howard). Even the most staunch Labor supporters would agree that the overall quality of Australia's education system has improved and literacy rates back that up.

Myth #3: Labor steered saved Australia from the GFC

No, the 23 billion dollar surplus, the zero net debt and low unemployment and interest rates given to Labor from the HOWARD Government saved the country from recession. How else do you think those stimulus packages were funded, eh? Not by money saved by Labor. Pull your head out of your arse, nuffy.

What else were they so supposed to do considering they were left with a near bankrupt economy still recovering from recession. Go on, genius. Tell us how they were going to get the money besides from selling of government assets. They made budget cuts but that was not going to pay of 96 billion dollars of debt and fund major projects now, was it?

You're a typical union hack that hangs onto every word of the Labor Party rather than doing your own research.