Are Sky biased?

Halling should have got the gig for that godawful Prizefighter abomination and Darke should have been in AC

 

Yeah, Halling is crap. But I'm guessing Darke has a Premier League game to commentate on today so couldn't be in the US.

 

WOW! Nt even showtime? Showtime is a good setup. Sky is terrible so of course that should be muted, who wants to listen to Amir Khan's wedding arrangments and Nicky Pipers thougths on anything? Nobody.

 

I don't know about biased, but they are completely ****. Valuev barely lands a punch on Haye and Watt reckoned Valuev had won:nut. Chilemba landed many right hands on Bellew that were not even acknowledged by those ****tards. You'd be better off putting it on mute and letting one of your mates do the commentary. Sky are a bunch of Clowns.

 

Thats exactly one more round than I gave him.Poor Lee was totally outclassed.

 

:good

 

Showtime is actually worse than Sky. Its Goldenboy TV

 

Yes, without a shadow of a doubt.

 

Does the pope **** in the woods?

Sorry Brenny, but thats quite possibly one of the most stupid question asked on this forum.

Seriously.

 

Very much so! It's cringe worthy.

 

Unfunny Craney joke No.2052

 

How could you give him any rounds? He covered up for 7 rounds. And Sky saying he showed heart and bravery? How? By covering up and been taken apart for 7 rounds. Purdy had no right being in that ring.

 

All they have to do now is hire Benny (The ****ing hair) Ricardo and the set up will define the word shitness.

 

Sky are biased across the board- today for example Jamie Redknapp has asked "Who wants to play in the Europa League?" three times today.

If Sky don't hold the rights to a competition then they usually either ignore it or try to devalue it. It's sometimes cringeworthy but understandable given their revenue model.

 

That a view shared by plenty of people that are not Sky employees?