Would These Diehards put Money on Ward-Froch II in London?

Well it would be in Britain and the chances of Ward getting a KO are slim... u never know.

 

Only the idiots. Ward is simply a better class of boxer.

 

If you saw Hall vs Perales and Dave Parris' score for McDonnell recently, you know Froch has a decent chance when the scorecards a read. If he keeps it remotely close that is.

 

I would put Money on Ward NOT traveling to London no matter what, to begin with. Easy money

 

I wouldn't risk over 100 quid, it would also depend on the odds (which I don't think would be that good because of the scorecards from the last fight) but alot of the willingness to bet on him isn't because I'm confident on him winning it's purely to make a potential win even sweeter.

 

I think Ward stops him in a rematch. Unless Froch really excels against Kessler.

 

calzaghes a better class of boxer than ward...doesnt stop yankee dooddle dandys pretending it would be a hard fight.

 

The scorecards were ******ed for their first fight in New York, so I don't think it'd be all that crazy to pick Froch with that in consideration.

Wasn't there two 116-112's? Most Froch won is 3 rounds.

 

....it was in atlantic city.

 

115-113's.

Alot of the rounds were Ward just about edging them, I had it 117-111

 

115-113 froch..i dont count those feather fisted punches thrown by ward that do nothing.

 

I was under the impression that most people realised Froch was soundly beaten and a rematch would probably have a similar, if maybe slightly less emphatic result.
Froch is one of the best exponents of baiting humour in boxing though.
He starts saying the fight was close and catches more fish than Sig Hanson.

 

I have no idea what makes you say that other than your blatant nationalism.

Ward is obscenely good and beats any current 168er in any ring in the world.