I really think montoya really taught mikkel some valuable new things, but the dane just didn't have the body left to implement them with the vigor needed. What do you guys think he would've been like had olsen never been in the picture?
http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=479035 http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=478631
Kessler has developed a better and more varied offense since starting work with Montoya. So yes, I think that he would have been a better option from day one.
Thanks pal. Had you read my 2nd post you dug up, you pathetic stalker, you'd have seen that i said if my source was right and kessler CAN IMPLEMENT his strategy then he wins. Well, he couldn't so....... What's your problem?
My problem is that you've given Carl no credit for his performance and behaved like a classless ***** spamming the general with a ton of **** threads. That's my problem.
http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=479198 http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=479172 http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=479171 http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=479169 Four threads made during or after the bout, which contradict your bold (and incorrect) assertions of the past week, and which displays your complete lack of class. Instead of congratulating Froch, you make threads about how he wouldn't stand a chance with Ward. Well guess what, no version of Kessler could either.
**** off you whiny brittard. I'm posting an analysis and an opinon. you should try it sometime instead of plagerizing other posters. ***!!
Or at least after the Calzaghe fight. The Calzaghe fight made it painfully obvious, that Kessler needed someone who could give him more tactical versatility. The second worst thing of Kesslers career (the worst being his injuries) is the two wasted years following his defeat to Joe.
The collapse of Mogens Palle, injuries and Olsen who was terrible at making adjustments hurt Kessler's career, yes. But that is easy to say now though.. Either way, Kessler has had a very good career.