That is a a truly ****ed up score card. Christ on a tricycle!, unforgivably wrong. It's boxing, not the X Factor, try and keep some semblance of reason.
1. Froch 10-9 2. Froch 10-9 3. Froch 10-9 4. Froch 10-9 (close) 5. Kessler 10-9 (close) 6. Kessler 10-9 (close) 7. Froch 10-9 8. Froch 10-9 9. Froch 10-9 10. Kessler 10-9 11. Froch (close) 12. Froch Even if I went back and gave the most competitive rounds to Kessler, Froch still comes out on top. No controversy to see here. Close rounds, not so close of a fight.
I didn't score it, but I felt Froch won easily. Kessler simply didn't throw enough punches and only won a few rounds clearly.
I didn't score consistently, but I thought it was very close. A draw or a point in either direction would seem fair.
Exactly. A fighter can win 7 rounds clearly while the other wins 5 rounds clearly. That is a clear winner. I hate when people feel 115-113 is an automatic robbery or swing fight.
This. This fight was easy to score. Froch won convincingly. Kessler had his moments but no way did he do nearly enough to win.
I said to myself maybe 3-4 times, "Okay, Kessler round." To top it off, I hate Froch. I was pulling for Kessler in this one. I picked Froch to win this though and I picked Kessler the first time.
Thanks man. I feel most people hate me on these boards, but I feel I am a pretty neutral, non-bias fan. I am a fan of less fighters now since the fighters I grew up with are retired. I follow only a few fighters all together, and most of them are recently followed.
6-5-1 froch. kessler landed body shots that were not counted, and generally landed the hardest punches of the fight. Frochs jab won the day.
Kessler 1,5,6,7,9,11 Froch 2,3,4,8,12 Round 10 i couldnt decide and scored even so if you give it to Froch its a draw.