Ward is 10x the fighter that Froch is.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HeavyweightCP, May 25, 2013.


  1. artful

    artful *practice makes perfect* Full Member

    4,163
    0
    May 8, 2010
    meh the 2 best SMW should fight, Ward would probably win there's not any other better fights out there in the division, if ward think he will win in the uk why not test himself.
     
  2. El Terrible

    El Terrible Active Member Full Member

    715
    0
    Apr 26, 2010
    But Frochs fights are 10x more entertaining. It hurts Ward you can tell. He's the better fighter and should be earning the better money and the bigger crowds, but hes not. Simply, the general public would chose to watch Carl over Andre every time.
     
  3. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    Ward has better speed and skills, but Froch is a professional guy who has put his all into boxing. Ward will have to fight another 10 years to put into boxing what Froch has. His fights the last 5 years has been top fighters over and over again. He deserves to be ranked very high.
     
  4. Collie

    Collie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,638
    8
    Jun 16, 2012
    He has better skills but I wouldnt say he is ten times the fighter.

    I think he would beat Froch agagin, UK or not. Hevshould go over there and do it to shut up a lot of his critics
     
  5. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    Froch & Kessler are world class G's.
    Ward's a US market fighter.

    Actually Ward is a 100x the boxer. Technically Froch is awful and that's an understatement. But it doesn't matter because ''Wardkke'' :)rofl) has no passport and only fights in his backyard.
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    Like I stated in another post Michael Nunn was looked on very well in 1988-1990. After he beat Frank Tate easily most people thought he was unbeatable almost including me. His legacy now is not that great.