Which British boxer do you have more respect for: Froch or Haye?

Haye has disappointed many of his fans and the public in general. Froch never fails to live up to his promises.

 

I have more respect for David as he has some actual boxing talent. Froch is a crude goon.

 

So did I, but only because this is a hate thread by design if you know the TS's history. I mean what even the point, we all know what the outcome of the poll is going to be.

 

Except in the Ward fight.

 

he might be crude, but you can't take away the fact that he always gives it his all, even if he's outclassed and behind on the cards

unfortunately, this can't be said about the more athletic and talented David Haye

 

Carl Froch is better than David Haye.

 

I agree but had to lament the fracture of a rare instance of ESB unanimity anyway.

 

Froch easily. although p4p I think Haye is better. Haye is faster and has that great right hand, but Froch is the definition of a professional fighter.

 

I agree. :good

 

Yes, nearly everyone here shares the same opinion on this. The poll result is very one-sided.

 

Well, for one thing Vitali isn't British.

 

Froch doesn't repeatedly disappoint the fans.

I'd actually like Haye to do a bit more before he retires, so Wladimir can have a HOFer on his resume. But it seems like it's not going to happen.

 

Carl Froch

 

Nah. The most one-sided ESB poll of all time is the Lufcrazy-Michigan Warrior "Floored" poll:good. Haven't seen it in a while, though. Froch, btw.

 

they're both ****. tyson fury is the troof.