Froch vs Calzaghe if Froch Beats Kessler.....

Failey we aint reading you cut and paste bias, it has no place in here.

Joe can still make a comeback and enhance his record if he likes/

 

atsch So you havent seen Ottke resume then? If you had a point you would have countered. Overall with the wins Ottke has.

1. It was only Ottkes 13th fight when he won a world title

Consider how Froch had to beat Johnson to get to fight Ward. That was old boiled down Johnson and it was considered a decent win, but Ottke beat prime Johnson at SMW back in 99.

2. Ottke made 21 title defences and was a winner of 22 world title fights

Consider how Hopkins MW reign is thought to be special yet Ottke had more SMW title victories than Hopkins had MW victories and overall fought better opposition

3. Ottkes reign was impressive when you consider he wasnt a puncher and didnt have an equalizer in his fists.

Look at who Ottke with feather fists beat

This content is protected

the then IBF SMW champ for the title, beaten twice

This content is protected

who went on to become the Ring & IBF LHW champ

This content is protected

world rated SMW who beat Reid and Johnson at SMW and who went on to become the WBA LHW champ

This content is protected

who went on to become the 2 time WBA SMW champ and beat SMW, LHW and CW champ Green as well as current MW champ Geale when past his best

This content is protected

the then WBA SMW champ and 2 time WBA champ

This content is protected

the former WBC SMW champ and still world class

This content is protected

the former WBO MW champ (a smaller fighter)

This content is protected

world class who went on to become European champ

This content is protected

world class who went on to become European champ

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

Now I dont think that any of those are better names than Kessler, but Kessler that Froch beat is faded and has not been very active of recent years due to injury and not the Kessler Calzaghe beat or possibly the one Ward beat, for that

 

You dont read it because you cannot counter it. If its cut and paste, then you would likely have read it before, and if that is the case, shows how delusional and bias you are that after seeing it more than once you still cant make a sensible counter, so you choose to bury your head and go on blindly with a belief that you cannot back up

 

lol the Boxrec warrior is getting wrecked in t his thread. lol comedy.

 

Calzaghe has the better resume, losses count and Froch has a few of them, Calzaghe was also always fighting on the road for such a great champion as well, Eubank, Woodhall, Reid ect all Englishmen in England, Veit in Germany, Jones Jnr and Hopkins in America.

Calzaghe has a better resume than Froch and of course any version of Calzaghe at any stage of his career when he was champion would absolutely have hammered Froch head to head at any stage of Froch's career, Froch wouldn't have taken one single round off Super Joe.

 

Froch has a better resume.

 

Agreed.

 

Then be fair. Eubank hadnt beaten anyone remotely worthwhile in several years. And never won another fight again. The win was good name on a young up and comer's resume, nothing more.

Hopkins was a very good win though.

As for the thread, its pretty close, I'd still say Calzaghe although Froch has the higher concentration of quality fighters. His last 5 years or so have been a whirlwind. But Calzaghe has the LHW crown as well as the best overall win of the group in his version of Kessler.

 

yeah that's why we aren't reading it again, becuase you keep bringing up the same disproved points from yesteryear in a cut and paste format.

and yet still claim its others who are delusional in the same post.

Is there a word for 'way beyond delusion'. Failey maybe.

 

Sir Joe