After seeing Andre Dirrell getting robbed in the UK it's easy to see why Ward won't..

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Chibuku, May 26, 2013.


  1. Sweet-D-Willy

    Sweet-D-Willy Tha Realest Full Member

    8,474
    4
    Jan 23, 2013
    :rofl

    And LOL @ "Dirrellevent"
     
  2. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    What are these high profile robberies in the UK?
     
  3. icha

    icha Active Member Full Member

    764
    0
    Apr 26, 2013
    i have seen more robberies in the us...
     
  4. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    What the hell is up with Dirrell anyway? Is he ever gonna fight again? At least someone relevant?
     
  5. RyDogg123

    RyDogg123 Active Member Full Member

    1,228
    12
    Sep 20, 2009
    I honestly think Ward would fight much harder in the UK, he'll know that he needs to win big and there's a possibility he could knock Froch out. Regardless, this sport is about skill and determination... Froch might equal him in one department, but i dont have to tell everyone what he doesnt.
     
  6. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Which, if he had done sooner (instead of being so negative), he would have won. He had the power and offensive capabilities to stun and get the better of Froch. But he didn't use them enough because he was intimidated by him. It was only when he got annoyed and fired back, did he realise Froch was human and that he could put hurt on him. Like I said, he didn't have enough faith in his abilities. He realised too late.
     
  7. technocrato

    technocrato Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,105
    300
    Dec 12, 2009
    Dirrell-Froch was a close fight, won by Froch. No robberies!

    Ward is scared of fighting away. Kessler has done it, Bute has done it. And we all know Ward won't.
     
  8. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    Thank you for your unbiased post. it's refreshing. :good

    Froch was the rightful winner. and the widest card for the Kessler rematch came from an American.
     
  9. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    just shut up you useless waste of breath. you couldn't score a fight if your life depended on it. if it was the other way round (Froch flopping about) you would have said there was no way that Froch could win after that pathetic performance.
     
  10. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    Dirrell fought like an absolute *****. the fact that you defend his display proves you have nothing of worth to say.
     
  11. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    :huh why didn't we like Dirrell? we didn't even really know who the **** he was back then. i saw one Dirrell fight before he fought Froch and it was, Meh. get over it you sad bunch of ****s. you look stupid defending that crap. you really do.
     
  12. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    LOL shut your ***** ass up. You're a ****ing disgrace just like most British fighters at the top level
     
  13. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    so you agree that international fighters that go to America get ripped off when facing a Yank? thanks for that. :good
     
  14. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    you disliked him because of how he was fighting in the fight numbnuts
     
  15. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    yeah, because Froch had so much more experience than Dirrell when they fought. shut it you wanna be American.