hell no! Saurland would want to have this fight in Germany to insure a better chance for a Pulev win.
From everything I can ascertain, Fury WILL be fighting Pulev in his next fight, and his team see him as a very winnable fight. It should be confirmed in just over a week. Not quite sure anyone would assume Fury would duck a guy who's BEST result is a 12 rounds win vs Travis Walker, where Pulev got put on jelly legs :huh
Thats what I've been saying. Why do people think Fury is scared of Pulev? ANd your right Walker hurt him bad. Pulev has an ok jab but he lacks punching power. Fury should take the fight. Pulev's camp is the one's hoping Fury will not fight him so Pulev gets a free title shot at WLad which he will lose bad. Pulevs team knows once he steps up they will get beat so they want the big payday with Wlad.
Fury will KO Pulev imo, with Fury its unlikely to go the full distance. He'll either KO or be KO'd. Pulev seems to be the most hyped fighter going at the minute.
I'm almost 100% certain it will be confirmed within the next 10 days. I also believe it will be incredibly one sided. On this Forum Pulev would be a huge favourite. As soon as the fight is announced bookmakers will have Pulev as a BIG underdog :good Make of that what you will. And if everyone on this forum is so confident they should back Pulev heavily at long odds to make fortunes
I've noticed over the years Euro fighters on this forum. SO far outside of the Klitschkos they all turned out to be bums. A few years back Alexander Dimitrenko was being hyped like Pulev is and he got exposed by 205 Eddie Chambers. It was funny as hell after all the hyped Chambers put his big ass down. Krasniqi was another hype job on this forum. Brewster and TT went to Europe and exposed most of these bums. Pulev will end up just like Dimitrenko when he steps up.
BTW Dennis Boytsov is also a hype job. He has fought no one and these WLad nhuggers claim he is the next big thing.
I've pointed out in a thread before, Pulev was HUGELY exposed at amateur level EVERY time he stepped up to face a Top 20 guy today. I never really understand when people board a 'hype train' that they are too lazy to look at the guy's amateur history. I'm a Brit, but by you tubing David Prices's amateur fights I absolutely KNEW he had a glass jaw :good Similarly Pulev performed so pathetically against the Top Boys in the amateurs, that you know he will fall short in the pros against his first test :hi: Fury is a HUGE step up, in every sense from Michael Sprott, Derrick Rossy and Travis Walker :yep
Fury is by far the biggest test Pulev has faced, but vice versa as well. Fury definitely has more talent than Pulev, but I wouldn't be that confident of a Fury victory. I fully expect Fury to get off to a strong start, and given his history, I'd say there's an excellent chance he lets that get to his head, showboats or otherwise gets sloppy/stupid, and Pulev capitalizes. If they fought to peak physical performance, yes Fury wins, but its a 50/50 fight for me and I won't be betting on either one. Also, Ustinov and Dimitrenko were Pulev's best wins, they were borderline top 20 HWs at the time, give him some due. Finally, I give amateur results more credit than a lot of people I've seen in the forums, but it is a different game ultimately. We all know about Audley, but there were also plenty of non standouts in amateurs who became great pros.
Ustinov and Dimitrenko are both bums and they always have been. Chambers knock Dimitrenko down for Christ sakes. The sad thing is Dimitrenko almost almost went the full 12 with Pulev. Pulev lacks power and he does not throw enough punches. He does not get any credit for beating Ustinov and Dimitrenkoas they are complete bums.