Who is more important to boxing history. Wladimir Klitschko or Floyd Mayweather Jr

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Wladimirschin, May 31, 2013.



  1. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    57,222
    17,673
    Jul 21, 2012
    Shut up Kroutwindsor
     
  2. gdm

    gdm Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,932
    6,986
    Mar 20, 2011
    Wtf are you talking about ?
     
  3. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    5
    Feb 21, 2010
    you're missing a comma. unless you think Wlad is a "Brittard"?

    you were talking about Deno weren't you? he's not a "Brittard" either... he's an Americunt. just like you. :good
     
  4. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    0
    Jun 25, 2011
    are you serious
     
  5. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    5
    Feb 21, 2010
    what is it about Americunts and the word "Homo"? you really like your men over there don't you.

    just give in to your desires and get it over with. you like the ****. don't deny yourself any longer. :good
     
  6. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    13
    Sep 1, 2007
    klitschkos will be just as remembered as joe calzaghe.
     
  7. Rock0052

    Rock0052 VIP Member Full Member

    34,223
    5,844
    Apr 30, 2006
    Depends purely on how much weight one puts on the heavyweight crown. If all were equal, it'd be Mayweather. But history tends to reward heavyweights more.

    If it's a heavyweight driven sport, then what Wlad's done could be seen as being more important historically because he's the first long reigning foreign heavyweight champ in history. There's been the occasional foreign champ from time to time, but none that was ever really viewed as anything more than a temporary placeholder until an American got the title back.

    Lennox was the first foreign fighter to crack U.S. dominance of the division in a meaningful way and started the job, but he didn't have the longevity as champion Wlad has. Wlad took not only the titles, but the spotlight away from the heavyweight division from the U.S. to Germany. That's something that even 10 years ago would've been laughed at had someone predicted it. That he's part of the only set of brothers that will ever become heavyweight champions in our lifetime is rarely mentioned, but worth noting regardless.

    So, if we're talking greater in a P4P sense in ring, I'd vote Mayweather. In terms of real world boxing historical significance, there's a much stronger argument for Wlad. Why? Because history loves heavyweights, and he represents a shift from the power structure of the sport's premier division that's been in place for well over 100 years.
     
  8. Kevin Jesus

    Kevin Jesus Active Member Full Member

    1,330
    0
    Dec 16, 2009
    So with this logic you also think Sugar Ray Leonard, Tommy Hearns, Roberto Duran, etc. would be forgotten over Wlad because they are in lighter weights?

    You are delusional.
     
  9. larryx2012

    larryx2012 I AM BETTER THEN YOU Full Member

    12,523
    30
    May 24, 2012
  10. Rock0052

    Rock0052 VIP Member Full Member

    34,223
    5,844
    Apr 30, 2006
    You don't genuinely believe that boxing history doesn't give more attention to heavyweights, do you?

    Willie Pep was superior to Marciano. Sweet Pea was better than Tyson and Holyfield. Benny Leonard was better than Dempsey and Jack Johnson. Sugar Ray Robinson was better than Joe Louis.

    Every single one of the lighter guys would rate higher on a P4P list than their heavyweight counterparts, but in each case, history gives more attention to the heavyweight.

    Fair or not, that's just how it goes. Sometimes it's because of out of the ring significance, sometimes it's for marketability. Regardless of precisely why, it is what it is.
     
  11. Pulev

    Pulev Guest

    Unless you are a Fab Four or Robinson.. history will NOT remember you as much as the heavyweights.


    The FAB FOUR+Ray Ray are immortals.. they are the light weight Gods standing tall amongst their heavyweight peers.

    Do you like not read?


    The Fab Four+Ray Ray are different. They are boxing immortals.
     
  12. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,476
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    Wladmir got spit in the face and licked up the residue. Floyd is a G, so this is an easy question.
     
  13. TysonFury

    TysonFury Guest

    Replace Lewis with Wlad and Lewis will have the same reign..
    Also the power shift is not going to last forever.. I highly doubt it will last even till 2020....

    Lewis did it in a far more significant manner too... He did it as the LONE Foreign super power among countless American super powers... Wlad is doing it as THE Foreign super power among countless lesser FOREIGN super powers.

    Wlad didn't wipe out the Elite American fighters like Lewis did.. Wlad didn't even get to fight them because they no longer existed.

    You can say Lewis ate the lion's share of American's HW'S glory.. Wlad is chewing on the bones.. Lewis beat the Americans when Americans still cared and were still a big part of the division. Wlad's best American win is an Ike Victim from 99....
     
  14. Rock0052

    Rock0052 VIP Member Full Member

    34,223
    5,844
    Apr 30, 2006
    You've persuaded me- Wlad was clearly the most important fighter. I had always thought Wlad just shifted the heavyweight scene, but as you astutely pointed out, he killed it. I never realized how much I underestimated his impact.

    You see, with Lennox, there was always another top American heavyweight ready to take him on. Fans were excited, contenders were excited. They lined up to take their shot. Lennox couldn't even find time to face them all, like the man Ike beat in 1999, but he had no problem finding and fighting top warriors.

    Not so with Wlad. The picture you've brilliantly painted of Wlad is less of a title reign and more of a reign of terror. Instead of stepping up to the plate for the most prestigious crown in combat sports as is custom, American boxers took their 100 years of heavyweight glory and simply went home once Wlad took over. The domestic heavyweight scene immediately transformed into something from Scar's reign from the Lion King. Your prudent prediction recognizes that U.S. interest will indeed come back, that we'll control the scene again by 2020 once Wlad the Impaler retires and his heavyweight reign of terror ends.

    No man, foreign or domestic, has ever brought the division to it's knees like this. Rather than risk the punishment of uprising now, our heavyweight hopes have to bide their time and hope themselves that Father Time can do what they dare not try to. And then we'll get our champions back.

    Well said, my friend. Well said. :good :happy
     
  15. Cael

    Cael Claudia Cardinale Full Member

    3,379
    8
    Sep 17, 2010

    what elite american fighter are you talking about?

    Shot to **** tyson and hoyfield, the same holyfield who went on next to lose to Byrd?

    beat americans when americans still cared?...really? shot to **** tyson who came for a payday and a 38yer old Holyfield?
    wtf are you talking about ****** noob?!!