Vitali a ducker. Wlad a ducker. Both seasoned pros. Fury is still a novice. I know which is more pityful.
Hard to tell if Haye < Pulev. Who have we seen Haye beat that's in Pulevs league. Chisora was made to be a god when he hug with a ONE ARMED Helenius. Other than that, Chisora aint done ****. Haye's best win at HW was a draw vs a 38 yo Nicolai Valuev where he ran for 12 rds landing the occasional potshot forcing Valuev to reset. Nothing in Hayes past gives us ample reason to believe he could beat Pulev. If Haye was such a great fighter he'd had gone for Pulev rather than Charr. As for Adamek Fury being a farce. Give Tyson some leeway here. He's only 25 y/o and he's already has 12 wins over top 100 guys. Thats more than many 40 year olds.:deal
WTF.......Tyson fought Etienne instead of Corrie Sanders. Tyson fought Botha instead of Bowe. Tyson fought Rudduck instead of Foreman.:think:think:think So Fury is gonna fight Adamek or Haye instead of Pulev. What's the ****ing problem with that coming from a 21 fight, 24 yo fighter.:huh:huh:huh
He beat Valuev who at the time was far more established than Pulev is today. Pulev is the single most overrated heavyweight on ESB.
So which is it: Fury is a heavyweight force or he's a green novice (who calls out people he has no intention of ever fighting)? He's one win and a few pounds away from getting a mandatory at the cruiserweight title. He'll challenge Hopkins next.
I guess I'm behind the times, but I thought Haye-Charr still on-just postponed 'cos of Hayes' hand. If that's the case it won't be 'til Late July at the earliest, more likely August, so what's with the talk about Fury-Haye. Haye's not even on the table at the moment, AFAIK. Look, Fury loses to Haye but gets a good payday, Fury loses to Pulev without many £s :- either way he's exposed and is unlikely to get a big payday down the line. I see the smarter option as continuing to build him a bit first in the hope of a better payday later, but his team might think he's never gonna get a better payday than Haye, and he might as well cash in now, while he'll still gotta bit of hype going. Either way, Fury is not, and never will be, a contender.
My guess is Adamek, since he gave up his belts not to fight Price, now gives up mandatory position not to fight Pulev, i dont think his team would let him fight Haye they kno he would KTFO Fury so that leaves Adamek...
What is more pityful is YOU, bring up two fighters who have nothing to do with the thread. Get some help, you don't have to live with the butthurt.