Size doesn't matter, just because DLH beat him, Canelo won't

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Anglosaxon, May 30, 2013.


  1. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Ashleigh, this has been asked on every page and answered on every page:patsch:patsch:patsch
     
  2. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    This legendary analysis provides all the answers to the fight.
     
  3. duwdu

    duwdu Member Full Member

    279
    0
    Jun 28, 2010

    You're a shameless liar on at least two fronts. First, you're lying that there's "overwhelming" opinion that fishnet won the fight. Secondly, once you were owned, you simply leapt unto the case with Hatton, and lied - yet again - that Snr did not have a dog in that fight! Which conclusively shows that you're a dum.b and pa.cta.ded 11-year old this year who didn't know that Snr trained Hatton too!

    I'm sorry for your depth of ignorance. Honestly, you're not destined to last in this game, and are a disgrace to what you're using as a moniker.

    P34c3
     
  4. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    Even a troll can get some things right. I actually agree 100% with your technical analysis of the fight. :deal
     
  5. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    31
    Oct 26, 2006
    I think Anglo has some points on what it takes to trouble Floyd, and Canelo may not have it.. I guess we will find out. I have a hard time believing Mayweather signs a fight that there is a good chance of him losing. We at least know Canelo doesn't make him afraid for his health.
     
  6. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Time the mods banned this incoherent obscure forumite for both lying, disrespect and spamming a thread about Canelo with inaccurate farcical comments on DLH and Hatton:patsch


    The point remains, a judge, Floyd SNR, the general public and the best commentator in boxing all agree that ODLH won. The fact you're now using your spite and malice to call Oscar fishnets and me, one of the most objective posters a ******* merely confirms your fragile state of mind and straw-man arguments.

    Now if the mods don't remove you, I will no longer grant you audience unless it is regarding Canelo, the actual topic.
     
  7. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :lol: LMFAO at this idiot!​
     
  8. duwdu

    duwdu Member Full Member

    279
    0
    Jun 28, 2010

    You believe too much in your own hype, calling yourself "an objective poster" when, in fact you're a crass Pac.**** who thinks he can write some prose. The fact that you label yourself "a most objective poster," shows the level to which you will sink in order to steal accolades, so you're seriously delusional.

    And you can't seem to stop lying.... You're saying the thread is about Canelo when, in fact you brought in your lopsided and hateful opinion that Oscar beat Floyd, and was presenting it as fact. And for your rude awakening, Larry Merchant is nowhere near the best analyst in boxing, in my opinion for one, and of hundreds, if not thousands of others on forums who were calling for him to be removed by HBO as a color analyst way before he chose to retire.

    So your opinion on Larry Merchant's take is just that - your personal opinion, and you need to stop being giddy about contrary opinion by others. For every one you mention that supports your opinion on who won the fight between Oscar and Floyd that's been cynically weaved as fact into the title of the thread, one can mention the official decision, as well as several analysts that said the contrary, and still do, including yours truly.

    And you don't label someone at your first response as you did here, and not expect to be so hit back.

    It's typical of people like you, that once they start losing an argument, they first get angry, then threaten to put the other person on ignore, then call for a ban - all of which you did in your last post. You don't realize, however, that forum moderators are not as fickle minded as that.

    You can continue with your class of "analysis," your choice. But just be aware of the adage that "Those who live in glass houses don't throw stones."

    P34c3
     
  9. Brian

    Brian Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,890
    0
    Feb 15, 2010
    If you truly believe Oscar won that fight, you're hopeless. :blood
     
  10. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,933
    Jun 13, 2012
    Yes, getting KTFO is "debatable". Marquez has arguably the only decisive victory in the series.
     
  11. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    I am not arguing, to argue suggests their is a chance the other persons opinion is right. It's been proven beyond a shadow of doubt I am right and substantiated by facts. Claiming you won an argument because you're a ***** who sides with other low-brow *****'s who think they control popular opinion with their ''ESB'' oligarchy while spamming nonsense on serious threads with their mob mentality is laughable and sad.

    I am petitioning for you to be banned because:

    A: You're generic so offer no gravitas, substance or constructive comments.

    B: You're clearly an alt

    C: You disrespected a legend and tried ruining his thread with off topic drivel

    Canelo is garbage btw and this is another fact that can't be escaped.:smooch

    No doubt when I return tomorrow, you will still be here lol.
    :pwned:ban1:ban1:ban1:ban1
     
  12. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Another alt and still deluded.:patsch

    It is debatable for a number of reasons, this is a Canelo thread so I don't need to address them.

    Off out I go now, cheerio.:hey
     
  13. duwdu

    duwdu Member Full Member

    279
    0
    Jun 28, 2010

    If you're referring to the title of the thread and its author, I fully agree. The folk shamelessly presents an opinion as fact... An unsuspecting/rookie observer would think DLH beat him (FMJ) in an official decision, be so misled, and just run with it.

    A patent, careless lie in a thread title.

    P34c3
     
  14. duwdu

    duwdu Member Full Member

    279
    0
    Jun 28, 2010
    You're seriously delusional with this post, especially your A, B, C.

    You claim you're disrespected, yet continue to disparage fighters and fellow posters, and label a fighter such as Canelo garbage, and say it is a fact? Honestly you're full of it.

    In any case, according to some others already in this very thread, you're a troll. Some are even surprised you managed to make some technical sense for once. How can a troll, who is repeatedly lying, seriously think he can petition against someone trying to keep him honest? You then give a lame excuse and run off the thread. LOL. Talk of lack of honor.

    P34c3
     
  15. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Quoted for the truth! Anglo is a certified troll.:good