I do agree on this point. I think enough primary sources and next day accounts side on it being from punches. Not that they couldn't be wrong.. but there is more evidence on it being from a punch imo
My interpretation based on the contemporary reports is as follows: Louis Walcott I was a controversial decision. Greb Tunney II was a robbery. I don't see a double standard here.
well there is... if you said one was most likely the wrong decision and one was a robbery there would be no double standard. To call one just controversial isn't giving the same weight to the SAME CATAGORIES you're calling a robbery in another instance.
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected