Three things. 1. The Eubank win was good, because like you say, it was Joe's first real test at 25. But the fact remains, Eubank was preparing for another fighter at a different weight, and was only given 11 days notice that he was facing a young southpaw. He was also at the end of his career, and only had two more fights at CW before retiring. It can't be classed as a GREAT win. 2. Who had Kessler beaten before he fought Joe? He hadn't beaten any elite fighters. 3. Your last question is ridiculous.
i don't give Joe full credit for the Jones win. it was good win but nothing more. Hopkins though, was a great win. :deal Calzaghe wasn't in his prime either. in fact, i considered Calzaghe to be slightly more past his best than Hopkins was. age doesn't tell the story on their prime you know. if you knew your boxing, you'd know that was the case. those 3 are probably better wins than Jones, but most definitely not Hopkins. stop sniffing glue will you.
Joe wouldn't of fought Hagler by moving off the back foot like Leonard did. he'd fight him on the inside. :deal
Joe didn't nearly get knocked out at all. he went down but got straight back up and put Mitchell down like a warrior. Mitchell was a huge puncher as well.
I actually exposed them as the boz-eyed freaks they are. :smooch I suspect you are ***man. How could you know about him when you joined after he was exposed? :think The same traits are there in both of you. Atrocious spelling. Unparalleled density. A penchant for tranny queens and scat. dead Bromley Bumsteak Dinovulva brutally exposed in front of a global audience of millions as being sick pervert hagman1989. :rofl:kowned
After you accused me of being the Hagman i looked up his old threads like i did after being called Popkins. A good chuckle reading them till i realised Hagman was a plant created to take the heat off you when you got busted shopping for whures.