Am I the only one here who agrees with 117-111?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sufan4eva13, Jun 22, 2013.

  1. Sufan4eva13

    Sufan4eva13 Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    0
    Everyone is saying Tom Schreck's scorecard was a disgrace, but to be honest I had the same score. On my card Paulie took 3 out of the first 4 and didn't win a round after that. To me the effect of a punch matters and I didn't see Malignaggi land a significant shot all fight. Didn't Broner outland him like 212-98 or something crazy in power punches? I thought 9 rounds to 3 was dead on.
     
  2. critix

    critix Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2012
    Messages:
    6,619
    Likes Received:
    493
    disgrace.
     
  3. Bad Boyz

    Bad Boyz Sportscenter Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Messages:
    2,518
    Likes Received:
    1
    No, I also agree with it.
     
  4. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2011
    Messages:
    25,548
    Likes Received:
    203
    i agree, it depends on how you score a fight, but 117-111 is just wrong
     
  5. sadlittleboy

    sadlittleboy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Messages:
    8,792
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disgrace, but then again I had Broner winning by a round.
     
  6. Carlitos13b

    Carlitos13b Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    1
    Absolutely, disgraceful....
     
  7. KidPerat

    KidPerat King Bee Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    1
    What significant shot did Broner land? When was Paulie rocked? Cut? Bruised? He didn't even have a red mark. Broner landed power punches (meaning anything besides a job) but the actual power didn't affect Paulie. 117-111 is a joke.
     
  8. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    21,014
    Likes Received:
    4
    I had it 116-112.

    I had Paulie winning 1,2,4, and 12 I think.
     
  9. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    Messages:
    11,778
    Likes Received:
    40
    116-112. Paulie wasn't landing really
     
  10. TheRoadWarrior

    TheRoadWarrior Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Messages:
    1,482
    Likes Received:
    1
  11. busstonedfx

    busstonedfx Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    0
  12. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2012
    Messages:
    22,790
    Likes Received:
    14,482

    No you are not the only one here who DKSAB.
     
  13. LondonRingRules

    LondonRingRules Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2011
    Messages:
    10,520
    Likes Received:
    1,137
    This.
     
  14. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    24,658
    Likes Received:
    29,415
    The body shots were landing.

    He would throw and left and right hook to the body, land both, then go upstairs and miss but often finished with a jab that landed.

    So he would land 3 of 6 shots in a combo.

    Maybe they didn't have a lot on them, but they were a lot more powerful than the head-shake from Broner in return.

    I'm with Paulie in that I don't have an issue with it being close either way, but the fight as I saw it Malinaggi won more than 3 or 4 rounds.
     
  15. yeyo monster

    yeyo monster Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5,197
    Likes Received:
    937
    disgrace!!! how can somebody be a groupie of this hype job broner?