** Broner vs Malignaggi ** Post Your Scores

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dirty Bastard, Jun 22, 2013.


  1. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    :lol::lol::lol::patsch:patsch

    Just stop. ****ing joke. Based on what? What 7 rounds did Paulie win? Are you ****ing serious? Do you know what the difference is between an arm punch and a REAL punch?

    Get the **** out of here.... you guys and your "activity wins fights" bull****. Broner landed the hard shots all night while Paulie was running for his life.

    PAULIE DID NOT LAND A SIGNIFICANT PUNCH ESSENTIALLY THE ENTIRE NIGHT.

    Who was kicking who's ass in there? If they fight until "somebody drops/round doesn't end till KD like the old days" who goes down? If you say Paulie you're a ****ing idiot.

    Pathetic that people are giving credit for shoe shining. Never score a fight again.
     
  2. Big_Bill_Bronzy

    Big_Bill_Bronzy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,546
    3
    Apr 23, 2009
    The funny thing is that the only judge who had a perfect night is Tom Schreck(117-111).

    This means that in each of the twelve rounds, at least one other judge scored like him.

    Tom Miller did an awful job(4 rounds). He should be banned.

    So, it is suspect?
     
  3. Big_Bill_Bronzy

    Big_Bill_Bronzy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,546
    3
    Apr 23, 2009
    You have to be mentally limited to have Malignaggi 115-113. This is plain stupid.
     
  4. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007

    :deal:deal:deal

    These ****ing idiots don't know how to score a fight. The 115-113 score for Paulie is what the real sham is.

    That guy should never be allowed to judge a championship fight again, period. Or any pro fight for that matter.

    He should stick to amateur judging.....
     
  5. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    On what basis did you give Paulie any round after the 4th? lol
     
  6. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    I had Paulie winning by a 2 rds.

    Had the politics not gotten in the way, the ref wouldve been nuetral and deducted points from Adrianna for kneeing Paulie and hitting on the break, rabbit punching and the numerous other fouls he was allowed to get away with because Haymon forced the refs hand.

    Had the ref rightly done his job Paulie would have won 118-110:deal
     
  7. Big_Bill_Bronzy

    Big_Bill_Bronzy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,546
    3
    Apr 23, 2009
    With all those fouls, Paulie would have won 118-110? :patsch
     
  8. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    Another blind fool. Paulie pulled his leg up... jesus. Clear as day on the replay.

    118-110? In what world? My god, I should just put anybody who posts a winning scorecard for Paulie on my ignore list.

    Every single one of these guys doesn't know ****. It's ****ing sad.
     
  9. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,890
    Apr 14, 2009
    All you guys ridiculing a 115-113 paulie win answer me this????
    Are you Calzaghe fans?? If so you are hypocrites to say Paulies lack of power caused him to lose. In his last few "fights: Calzaghe barely threw a legitimate PUNCH!!! He SLAPPED like a girl yet you call for him as a HOF ATG:patsch:rofl
     
  10. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    What bearing does anything you just said have to do with WHAT ACTUALLY TRANSPIRED IN THE RING LAST NIGHT????? What the **** does Joe Calzaghe have to do with Broner vs Malignaggi?

    Absolutely nothing.

    What rounds did Paulie win, and why? On what basis did Paulie win a single round after the 4th?

    The judge who scored it 117-111, had another judge scoring it exactly like him in all 12 rounds. The only one of the 3 judges.

    That scorecard was the most "legitimate" out of all of them. Even the punch stats that you idiots cling to, clearly favor Broner.
     
  11. Big_Bill_Bronzy

    Big_Bill_Bronzy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,546
    3
    Apr 23, 2009
    You are plain stupid. I don't care about Calzaghe. There is some criterias to judge a fight, and Broner lost 3 or max 4 rounds.
     
  12. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    Oh god this poll should be public. Everybody voting Paulie and Draw are ****ing ******s who can't score a fight to save their lives. Their entire boxing opinion should be deemed "irrelevant."
     
  13. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    115-113, Broner won the later rounds
     
  14. yeyo monster

    yeyo monster Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,198
    937
    May 4, 2012
  15. Jordan_Davies

    Jordan_Davies Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,502
    0
    Jul 28, 2011
    115-113 Paulie

    He forced the action and out hustled Broner most of the night, Broner was obviously the stronger fight but Malignaggi outlanded him so much that he should have won

    If there was any justice the correct score would have been 115-111 due to the fouls but I gathered there would be controversy after the referee had shown his face

    Good on Paulie for speaking out against Haymon, I have 10x more respect for him than I originally did