Ring website reports that Broner was 'dominant' against Paulie

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Jun 23, 2013.


  1. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013
    Not sure what fight they was watching but I'm sure their sensationalistic reporting is leading to one thing.....


    Broner pound 4 pound number 3 :deal

    Attention those of you voting he drops out of the top 10:

    The poll is not where you think Broner should be in the pound for pound top 10 because everyone who's not a ****** knows he shouldn'tbe in it...

    The question is- where do you think The Ring will place him
     
  2. Sufan4eva13

    Sufan4eva13 Member Full Member

    209
    0
    Jul 11, 2009
    Broner was dominant, and anyone who KSAB agrees.
     
  3. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013

    :lol: Are you also on Golden Boy's payroll?

    Take Mikey Garcia's performance last week against Juan Manuel Lopez- that was dominate- he dominated every second of every round dropped a guy who was in pound for pound list a couple of years ago twice en route to stopping him in the 4th round

    Getting an SD over a guy who actually was dominated in his prime by Amir Khan (when Khan was the same age as Broner), never dropping or hurting Paulie amidst several cries of robbery is hardly 'dominate' is it you BroTard
     
  4. Spman20999

    Spman20999 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    I don't like that phrase. I feel like it is something that people say when they can't justify their arguments. Still, it applies rather nicely to you. Because, in all honestly, you really don't appear to know much when it comes to the sport.
     
  5. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013
    @ shenmue

    Please note- the poll is not asking where you think Broner SHOULD be in the Ring's rankings, it's where you think he WILL be
     
  6. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,693
    Mar 18, 2012
    How is a SD win with many people calling robbery dominate? Broner got out worked by a 32 year old malignaggi.
     
  7. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013
    :good
     
  8. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013

    :deal


    Got me Forza, maybe Oscar wrote the report for them

    :conf
     
  9. nicamarvin

    nicamarvin Guest

    QFT... :deal


    you Haters Keep On Hating........ Broner will keep dancing on yo...
     
  10. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    I think they'll justify putting him above Mares because at the same age, Broner has done what Mares hasn't: heroically jump over weight class full of good fighters to fight the weakest champ at his natural weight. Next stop, more 15lb weight advantages against lightweights. Can't wait, that Broner kid sure puts on a hell of a show. You see his backpack??? And that hairbrushing routine...I don't understand it or why it's supposed to be cool but man is it cool, gets me every time.
     
  11. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013

    Well Wlad hasn't won world titles in 2 different weight classes. They will probably justify putting him above Wlad too stating "Klitschko's trainer also performed poorly against Seth Mitchell" :lol:
     
  12. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    I don't know why people get so excited about the ring article. It is kinda of critical towards Broner. I expected more of Broner, everybody did I think. That doesn't change the fact that he dominated Pauli in my opinion and the opinion of a lot of observers. I favor clean effective punching, damaging punches when I score fights. Broner was pressuring Pauli the whole fight and punish him with some hard shots hurting him seriously once with a body shot and wobbling him here and there. Now the fight also showcased some of Broner's limitations. He doesn't seem to carry the power that well to WW. He is not going to fight midgets over there. He was very lazy and inactive trowing only 250 punches!! That might show a bad training camp and some future stamina problems at the weight. Had he been more active he was going to stop Pauli.
     
  13. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013
    Attention those of you voting he drops out of the top 10:

    The poll is not where you think Broner should be in the pound for pound top 10 because everyone who's not a ****** knows he shouldn'tbe in it...

    The question is- where do you think The Ring will place him
     
  14. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013

    He never hurt Paulie badly, not like Khan and Cano did
     
  15. Sufan4eva13

    Sufan4eva13 Member Full Member

    209
    0
    Jul 11, 2009
    No, but he wobbled him a few times and hurt him noticeably with a body shot in I believe round 6. In any case Paulie had a really bad night against Cano and Khan is honestly a brilliant fighter when you take his chin deficiencies out of the equation (which Malignaggi did). If Khan had a chin he might be top 5 P4P right now. But the truth is that he can't take a punch, so the only guys he will look his talent level against are guys with no pop like Malignaggi. That's not an indictment of Broner, Paulie's got an iron chin.