Which of The Ring Champions do YOU recognise as the true lineal champions.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Jun 24, 2013.


  1. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    Here is my thoughts:


    Wladimir Klitschko- no not unless he beats Vitali Klitschko

    Yoan Pablo Hernandez- Controversially yes. I do. There was a big uproar about this when Hernandez won by beating Cunningham as Huck was removed from the ratings because he moved to Heavyweight for one fight (vs Povetkin)- the controversial nature of this championship crowning prompted them to change their championship policy.

    Before Cunningham-Hernandez 1, Cunningham was ranked #1 and Huck #2. After Hernandez beat Cunningham they moved Huck to number 1, Hernandez went second and Cunningham dropped to 3.

    However, I believe Hernandez should've been 1, Cunningham 2 and Huck 3 for the following reasons:

    1. Cunningham had already stopped Huck
    2. While that fight was a few years earlier the controversy of Hernandez win over Cunningham, I don't believe he deserved to be dropped below Huck
    3. Huck was no stranger to dodgy wins himself at the time

    Therefore I think Hernandez-Cunningham 2 was between the rightful number 1 and 2 at Cruiserweight and Hernandez won.


    Adonis Stevenson- yes. Hopkins and Dawson was number 1 and 2 in the division back in early 2010- however Hopkins dropped to about 4 or 5 because he performed poorly against Jones Jr, though still won convincingly. I don't think that was just, and it left Dawson and Pascal to fight for the vacant title- with Pascal winning though, I would've had him and Hopkins as number 1 and 2 and when they fought, with B-Hop becoming champion in the 2nd fight. Hopkinsdropped it to Dawson, who's dropped in to Stevenson.


    Andre Ward- yes. Following Calzaghe's retirement, I believe the Super Six quite rightly left Ward and Froch as number 1 and 2 to battle for the vacant belt.

    Sergio Martinez- yes. Hopkins was the champ, he lost it to Taylor, he lost to Pavlik, Martinez beat Pavlik.
    This content is protected



    Saul Alvarez- tricky one but yes, I believe his win over Trout should've given him the vacant championship. Mayweather was ranked because of his win over Cotto. Floyd dropped down to Welterweight and hadn't fought for a year at Junior Middle and it was unclear whether he would again. Trout and Alvarez was then left as the top 2. However if in your opinion Mayweather should be given more time and he and Alvarez should be number 1 and 2, then I won't argue. The winner of their fight is definitely the number the champ after anyhow.

    Floyd Mayweather- This will cause some controversy here but no. However I do believe there is a lineal champion at 147 and that man is Tim Bradley. Allow me to explain before I get ripped a new arse hole by *****'s.


    • Mayweather vacated the title in 2007 during his brief and aborted retirement.
    • Following Mayweather win over Mosley on May 1st 2010 and Pacquiao's wins over De La Hoya, Cotto and Clottey, both was number 1 and 2 (in what order was up for debate)
    • Number 3 and 4 was Berto and Mosley (again order up for debate), note than Mosley's draw vs Mora was at 154
    • On the 16/4 2011, Victor Ortiz beat Andre Berto. Being that it was Ortiz's Welterweight debut and Berto was largely unproven against world class foes, therefore I ranked Mosley 3 and Ortiz 4.
    • On May 1 2011, a year had passed since Mayweather stepped in the ring and at that time he didn't have another fight scheduled.
    • That left Pacquiao and Mosley 1 and 2 in my rankings- they then fought on 7/5/2011- with Pacquiao the victor.
    • Despite the controversial results of JMM-Pac 3 and Bradley- Pac, the official results have lead to Bradley holding the lineage in my eyes.


    Danny Garcia- no. I don't think he and Khan was number 1 and no 2 in the division at time they fought (Garcia's biggest win at the time Morales, Khan was coming off a loss), however the winner of him and Lucas (should they fight) will be the champion in my mind.

    Mikey Garcia- no. Any championship fight should go through Chris John.

    Guillermo Rigondeaux- Yes. I believe Nishioka and Donaire was number 1 and 2 when they fought, Rigo beat Donaire, so yes.

    Akira Yagashi- Yes. He holds the lineage passed from Wongjongkam, to Sonny Boy Jaro, to Igarahi, to Yagashi.
     
  2. sadlittleboy

    sadlittleboy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,792
    0
    Mar 12, 2009
    Yaegashi (you missed the "e") is a funny one. He's the lineal champion (however you want to spin it) but Estrada is "the man".

    Cruiserweight is a mess but a VERY enjoyable mess.
     
  3. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    Everyone is the true lineal champ except for:

    Mikey Garcia
    Danny Garcia
    Yoan Pablo Hernandez
     
  4. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    You not think Alvarez is a controversial one too (obviously the winner of him Mayweather is not)

    And do you not think Wlad really should have to beat Vital?

    I've noticed TRB only has Stevenson, Ward, Martinez, Rigo and Yaegashi.
     
  5. MoJoGoodie

    MoJoGoodie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    118
    Nov 29, 2011
    pretty spot on...i'd say that in the Floyd one though you used a lot of your personal rankings as you stated...."in my eyes"
     
  6. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    Lineages are all personal opinion, as the TS shows through his reasoning some inevitable hypocrisies which will arise.
     
  7. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    I find the case of Wladimir to be of the "extreme circumstance" variety.

    Just as I do with recognizing Mayweather vs. Guerrero, since the only other man I rated ahead of Guerrero at WW was JMM. The "extreme circumstance" of Mayweather having beaten him by 13 points a few years before at WW leads me to view May/Guerrero for the vacant lineal.

    I am not a savage. I would never fight my brother and wouldn't want Wladimir to fight Vitali. Therefore, it falls into the category of obscure exceptions (which, once again, is further proof that lineages are not able to be proven).

    I think Alvarez vs. Trout was the two best JMW's facing off. Had Floyd not had a fight scheduled at WW when that fight happened, perhaps that would be more debatable in my eyes. But I think it pretty clearly was for the lineage (in my eyes, can't stress enough how much opinion factors in as one would be sure to be hypocrites when giving their opinion if they did for each case).
     
  8. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    As for Garcia vs. Khan, not only were they not #1 and #2, but neither one of them were in the top 2. Lamont Peterson and Lucas Matthysse held those rankings and they did so in damn near every single persons' mind.

    Garcia vs. Salido may have been the #2 and #3 FW's facing off, but Chris John was clearly the top guy in the division. He is the longest reigning title holder in boxing; at the same division. His achievements clearly merited higher ranking than the two guys who fought for the vacant Ring title. I don't recognize it.

    YPH is utter bull****. I have complained about this often. I believe it was February of 2012 when the Ring made its first executive decision regarding lineages. They booted Huck from the rankings entirely based on him having fought Povetkin at HW. He was the clear cut #1 CW at the time and nowhere near the 1 year of inactivity required to boot him from the rankings, but they did so anyways to allow the winner of YPH vs. Cunningham II to become lineal champ. Huck was reinserted into the rankings just weeks later. This was done, and a few months later the Ring revised their lineal title policy to allow for the winner of Khan vs. Garcia to become champ.

    But this is about "lineal titles" not "Ring lineal titles." So 2012, particularly the Huck/Hernandez/Cunningham fiasco, is the moment in time where I will forever differentiate between lineal and Ring titles. With the exception of the 3 I have listed though, the rest they do have correct.
     
  9. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Yep, nothing against Floyd Mayweather- he's clearly the best fighter at Welterweight and if you don't have a champion he would be ranked 1st.

    I feel removing a fighter due to a year of inactivity when they haven't got a fight scheduled is the right one.

    I know at the time of the Pacquiao- Mosley fight the Ring had Pac number 1, Ortiz number 2 and Mosley number 3 and Berto number 4 (they was followed by a bunch of Euro level fighters like Zaveck, Senchenko and Jackiewiez) I just felt Mosley win over Magarito, despite a loss to Mayweather (no shame in that) he had achieved more than Ortiz had in his debut. Thus I felt Pac v Sugar Shane should've been a title fight (as bad as it sounds)
     
  10. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    This link will take you to the Ring Magazine rankings. The year listed shows the rankings for the END of that year. At the end of 2010, before Pac fought Mosley in May of 2011, Mosley was ranked #5.

    ********boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine%27s_Annual_Ratings:_Welterweight--2010s

    Unless you really feel that Mosley deserved to be ranked ahead of both Ortiz and Berto, there really isn't an argument to make. Plus you would have had to remove Floyd for inactivity, as he was 5 days past his 1 year allotted time.

    Now this next part makes the argument I have quoted null:

    If you removed Floyd from the rankings before Pac/Mosley because of his 1 year inactivity at WW, than you too would have removed Mosley from the rankings, since the last time he fought at WW was the same night Mayweather laced up. Therefore, it is not possible for Mosley to have been ranked the day he fought Pacquiao without Mayweather also being ranked. And with Mayweather also being ranked, it would make zero sense for a Pacquiao/Mosley fight to be for the lineage.
     
  11. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    I think the Ring brought in a policy at time around about a week before the fight that they dropped fighter who got caught cheating- putting Garcia and Khan into championship slots and the argument against Matthysse was 'Khan beat Judah and Matthysse didn't'

    I agree on John was the clear guy at Featherweight- I'd argue that Garcia was not even the number 3 back then as he hadn't really beaten any top ranked guys.

    I think the outrage of over looking Huck lead to the Championship policy (or them trying to save face as I believe it was) however I'm not as against Hernandez being the recognized champ as you are (my reasoning is in the OP)

    There rankings are getting worse. Check out their Strawweight rankings on their website for example.

    Hekkie Budler beat Nkosinathi Joyi by SD last week. They are obviously aware it happened because their records are updated accordingly. Yet Joyi is ranked 3rd and Budler....7th! :-(
     
  12. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Yes but the policy is, if they have a fight scheduled, they remain in the rankings. Mayweather didn't at the time. I believe he signed to fight Ortiz round about June/ July time.
     
  13. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Like Smoak I don't consider Hernandez and the Garcias lineal chmaps for precisely the reasons he mentions.

    I also don't recognize Alvarez as lineal at this point. Floyd's win over Cotto gives him just as much claim, and he signed to fight in the division prior to one year elapsing. I'm inclined to think no lineage has been established yet.

    Wlad and Floyd are problematic, but aren't entirely without merit.

    If you're really being a stickler you could argue Gradovich is technically the lineal champion at light heavyweight. Then again, the fact that his win over Erdei was such a robbery makes me more sympathetic (unjustifiably) to those who say Erdei vacated the title.
     
  14. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    June 7th it was he scheduled his fight with Vicious Victor

    ***********.mlive.com/mayweather/index.ssf/2011/06/floyd_mayweather_announces_sep.html
     
  15. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    Yeah it was def signed in mid-June if memory serves.

    Very good counter point. But the whole "scheduled fight" is sort of ridiculous. What if somebody had a fight scheduled for 6 months from then... and then they cancel that fight? They deserve to sit at their ranking the whole time?

    I don't care about a fight being scheduled. I care about the 1 year inactivity time.