you ignore him because you cannot win a boxing discussion against him and you are sick of losing to him.
Borges was talking bollocks like you do! He gets accused of taking easy fights, then Borges says in regards to Ruiz "I think he'll find a Rottweiler behind the door." You've been given EVIDENCE as to why certain fights didn't get made. :good
You put me straight the other day?? I OWNED you TWICE, and you NEVER REPLIED BACK. I iced you like Roy did with Griffin in the rematch! You can't get back up from that. You can't ignore facts and logic. :good
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl cannot win a boxing discussion?? he doesn't even know what the god damn hell he's on about. lose to him?? :blood why would i waste more time with someone who's incorrect all the time? it's just pointless.
Ruiz was a cherry pick right from the start. he claimed that he wanted to fight Lewis, but it was more bollocks from Roy. he could have unified with Byrd and then taken a fight with Vitali. he didn't want to know! :deal you have no evidence, just your own spin on things. :deal
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl you owned me twice??? can you please point out where you "owned me twice"? you're deluded!
:blood really??? no, seriously... really?? if you can point out to me where he talks the truth, i'll be very interested to see that. because all i've seen is him talking about situations that he knows nothing about. :deal
My points are FACTUAL and can be backed up. Let everyone read - RJJ Vs Hearns....MW :good I'm bumping it now. Tell us again about how Joe would have stopped Roy when prime, and how he had better footwork.
no... why because jones beat hopkins and toney at thier peaks....and toney was too fatt to have a rematch wit jones