ESB Weight Obession: Class vs Mass

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by JLP 6, Jun 28, 2013.


  1. rusak

    rusak Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,276
    30
    Sep 28, 2012
    This thread is a good example of old time nutbaggery.

    JLP says that Roy "bare threw 15 punches round" against Ruiz and won every round. Actually, Jones threw over 35 punches a round, about the same as Ruiz -- and though he dominated the fight, he didn't win every round on my card.

    So guys can beat guys bigger than themselves? Wow, what an amazing revelation!

    Yes, Marciano KO'd 254 Humphrey Jackson. Jackson had been previously KO'd by a no-name middleweight, but I guess we're supposed to consider this a great achievement on the part of Marciano.
     
  2. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    1,866
    31
    Sep 24, 2010
    That was a mistake. It should be an "L" because Willard definately beat Johnson.

    Thanks.
     
  3. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    1,866
    31
    Sep 24, 2010
    This thread is an example of boxing fans having a dicussion of which I am happy you weighed in on.

    Starting with Jones - Ruiz. Let me say that I was wrong. Thank you for the correction. Lets explore the fallout of my mistake please.

    Roy averaged 35 punches a round, true. Roy landed 11 per round and Ruiz was 7. Not a barn burner. Ruiz was the champion. The point is spare me the "today's heavywieghts are so much superior than Joe Louis' era". If they were so great 11 punches landed each round would not have been enough to take is title by a guy who had to put on 15 pound over night to be considered a heavyweight.

    And please, how do you explain only landing 7 punches and throwing only 36? Sheesh the heavyweight average is maybe 46. That is the average! If you are the champ and losing how about doing something about it other that being bigger than your opponent. The champion should have blown Roy out weighing 226 (33 more pounds than Roy)in this glorious era of Heavy, skilled heavyweights. Not even sure why anyone would defend this era when everything is so clear that despite the size these guys are bums and kinda greats. Lennox is a first rate all-time fighter but really, he was nothing to get excited about even in his prime.

    Maricano weighed under 190 pounds for this his fight with Jackson. It was Maricano's 7th career fight. 254 meant nothing to him then and it wouldn't mean anything to a prime Maricano now.


    Thank for you input.

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/John_Ruiz_vs._Roy_Jones_Jr
     
  4. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    1,866
    31
    Sep 24, 2010
    I check the sizes of Joe's opponent and he weighted more than them more often than not. Great point. Be KO'ed then and the guys he weighed less than. Skill was the defining attribute for him and Ali.

    Lennox was KO'ed by one shot by a guy he almost had 20 pounds on. Rahman was not a great fighter. Ali would have KO'ed this man everytime they fought but like Joe Louis would have.

    Rahman...man please. KO'ed 6 times and drawing with Jame Toney. And you sit here and tell me he dominates the 60's-70's.
     
  5. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    Holyfield beat Foreman who weighed in at 257 Lbs. He beat Douglas who weighed in at 246 Lbs. Holmes was over 240 Lbs. He drew with Lewis and lost a close decision to him, Lewis was over 240 Lbs. As pointed out Valuev was 310 Lbs... an old as dirt Holyfield outboxed him but was robbed of the decision. Size isn't everything.

    Size does matter though... you have to know how to use it. The Klitschkos know how to use it. Lewis knew how to use it. Ali fought like he was even bigger than what he was. Vs. Ali it was like facing a well skilled 6'6" 250 Lber with speed.

    I cant say that I agree with you on Dempsey and Marciano stopping the likes of Wlad or Lennox though. Lewis and the Klitschko's are much more than big men. They are highly skilled fighters.
     
  6. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    Ali and Louis are two completely different fighters and on different levels IMO. Ali was taller, had a longer reach, and was heavier than Louis. He was also faster and more durable than Louis. At 6'3", 81" reach, and 215 + Lbs. he was plenty big enough. Mix in Ali's other qualities and a strong case can be made that he is still the best HW ever.

    Louis, Marciano, Dempsey, Johnson, and others? Yeah, probably too small... but doesn't mean they would lose to every decent modern HW bigger than them.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,222
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  8. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,206
    37,940
    Aug 28, 2012
    JLP your analogy in post #21 is inaccurate because you compare the worst of the modern age to the best of a prior age. Marciano probably could have taken Ruiz too, but there is no chance in hell he's beating Tyson, Holyfield, Lewis, or Klitschko. Ruiz is bigger but less skilled. The Klitschko's and Lewis are bigger and just as skilled as the older champs. Primo Carnera and Jess Willard may be the same size as those guys but there is an obvious gulf in talent, which you are not accounting for.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,222
    Feb 15, 2006
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    , and some that are outright untrue.

    Perhaps it says something that the only way you can pull your favourite fighters up to the level of the greats of the past is to find some ridiculous basis for acting as if most of their wins didn’t happen., and make a colossal assumption about the superiority of their opposition.
     
  10. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    1,866
    31
    Sep 24, 2010
    I am completely OK with the differences of oppinion on the Head to Head's. Actually on everything else you posted as well. I cannot prove that size matters as the determining factor or any other attribute in the heavyweight division. The point that this thread is making is that certain great fighters of every era have overcome all obstacles. Maricano over came size and skill with very subtle/crude skill, an iron chin, and an iron punch. His will/heart mattered just as much and it would matter in a fight with Klitschko and Lewis.
     
  11. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    1,866
    31
    Sep 24, 2010
    First let me say thank you for posting that matchup by weight list. I will be using it for as a reference point in future discussions.

    As for my accuracy/fairness. If you noticed what I was quoting, everything I posted was a reponse to Rusak comment directed to me. He bought this comparision out. I simply responded.

    When you say that Maricano "probably could have taken Ruiz", I know that you and I, no disrespect intended, are a long way from getting on the same page. And why? Only because Ruiz weighed more. Yet, Roy definately beat Ruiz, easy, and Roy would be put in the hospital by Maricano. Tarver almost killed Roy at 175.

    Lennox is an all-time great. Can he beat Maricano? It will take more than him being 246 pounds and skilled. Skilled? They don't come more skilled than Charles and Walcott. Mass? He beat ten guys over 200 pounds. All by KO. Lennox and Wladimir have weaknesses just like Rocky and the rest of them. With Maricano, Lennox and Wladimir would be in with a guy who never stops coming, never gets tired, never been KO'ed. Been down on the mat a total of 5 seconds in his entire career, and out 0f 49 fights, only seven made it to the bell, and believe me, they weren't in great shape at the bell.

    Dempsey weighed the same as Rocky. He hit harder than Rocky, was faster and more skilled. He looked like a middleweight in there with Jess. BTW, Willard beat Johnson in 26 rounds outside in the Cuba heat, so can we stop with the "today's athelete are better conditioned"? Back to Jack, who was a destroyer. Do you really think that Wlad with that chin is going really going to beat Dempsey with his movement, defense, and power? Wladimir is not more agile, balanced, and fiercer than Jack. Seriously, Wlad is lucky to go 12. Lennox because he is "great", I will give him a pass on maybe beating Dempsey, but remember this is the same guy who did not KO a old former crusierweight Holyfield whom he outweighed by 30 pounds. Why all of a sudden he is this beast that cannot be stopped by lighter fighters? I think that Dempsey gives Lennox the kind of fight that a prime Tyson should have given him. A serious, serious run for his money.
     
  12. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    1,866
    31
    Sep 24, 2010
    Uncoordination? Like who....Jersey Joe Walcott? Comparied to Wladimir Klitschko Jersey Joe is Baryshnikov.

    Far less conditioned....like Jim Jefferies? His fights were scheduled to go 20-25-45 rounds. He never lost. Then he came back 5 years after retirement to fight a prime JACK JOHNSON and 15 of 45 rounds. Today's fighters go 12.

    Cruiserweight? (200 pound limit) Imediately KO them? Ruiz did not imediately KO Jones. Lennox did not immediately KO Holyfield. Wladimir fought Chris Bryd 213 pounds and was not immediately KO'ed. Not sure when this men became beast.
     
  13. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,206
    37,940
    Aug 28, 2012
    You are welcome, and thank you for the compliment.

    I didn't see that. Forget I mentioned it.

    I don't know about that. I can see that fight going like Jones vs Toney. Before his punch resistance left Jones was a beast. Toney could swat too and was very skilled. Like Marciano, Toney had the punch of a much larger man than his figure suggested and it was killing him to make weight down at super middle. He'd just gone 46-0 when Roy took his zero and would later float up to the heavyweight division and throw a beating on John Ruiz just like Roy Jones did. Tarver messed up Jones but that was after Jones' had wrecked his body and couldn't fight like he used to.

    Charles and Walcott were very skilled, but Charles was a light heavyweight and Walcott was a cruiserweight. Walcott was 39 when he fought Marciano, had lost 16 and had been KO'd 4 times. Charles was only 33 and he probably wouldn't have been far past prime if he hadn't already fought 100 fights and been in wars with Walcott and others. I liken his condition to the condition Pryor found Arguello in. Arguello was only 30 but he'd already had 90 fights and been in crazy wars with Escalera and others which had prematurely aged his body making him ripe pickings for 28 year old Aaron Pryor who'd only made 31 fights.

    Look at the names and records though. Humphrey Jackson, Bill Hardeman, James Patrick Connolly, Artie Donato, Eldridge Eatman, Johnny Shkor, Bill Wilson, Keene Simmons, Don ****ell. A bunch of nobodies with terrible records. Joe Louis, a great heavyweight, was 37 at the tail end of his career after already returning from his first retirement.

    Because he'd never fought any quality heavyweight let alone super heavyweights like these two.

    I never claimed they were better conditioned, though roids definitely help.

    Sure, Wlad has gotten very good at protecting his chin and pacing himself so as not to punch himself out like he did before Emanuel Steward got a hold of him. If Wlad had to fight Dempsey it would look a lot like how Tunney fought him. Every time Dempsey tries to get in close Wlad would tie him up in the clinch. Then when they were split up by the ref Wlad would punch him at range with his longer arms.

    A lot is made of Dempsey's knockout of Willard, but Willard had been knocked out before and would be again by other guys. Joe Cox knocked him out before Dempsey, and Luis Angel Firpo knocked him out after Dempsey. Given these other data points for comparison we can surmise that it would take someone with a punch equivalent to that of a 220 pound man to knock out Willard. Dempsey did punch above his cruiser weight class. He punched like a 220 pound man, like a true heavyweight, but that's different from being a hard punching heavyweight like George Foreman or Earnie Shavers. Wlad has been in with guys who hit as hard or harder than Dempsey since his knockouts and triumphed because his defense has improved since then. Wlad might have trouble with Dempsey's crouch, if he was making himself small, but I still see this going like the Tunney/Dempsey fights, or like the Tyson/Holyfield fights.

    I wasn't impressed by Lennox' performance against Holyfield either. But even though Holyfield started at cruiser his build was always a true heavyweights. 6'3" 78" reach 215-225 weight, same as Ali or David Haye, not superheavy but not too small to fight one either.
     
  14. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    Believe it or not, Holyfield is 6'0 3/4" tall; that's his barefoot height measurement. He was always listed as being 6'1" in the olympics and amateurs; he then moved to heavyweight, and he magically grew to being 6'2 1/2". Not that it matters any, but Holyfield was not as tall as Ali or a lot of the past champs.
     
    Jackomano likes this.
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    :good