Haye v Fury - PPV worthy?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Solaris, Jul 10, 2013.


  1. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    Definitely not.

    Impossible to argue otherwise.
     
  2. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,865
    Apr 19, 2010
    more worthy than khan v presscott
     
  3. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    That fight isn't the measurement for judging whether a fight is PPV worthy otherwise the vast majority of fights would be.
     
  4. Leif Erikson

    Leif Erikson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,560
    115
    Oct 3, 2004
    Yes. Not in terms of prestige, but as far as business goes? Most certainly.
     
  5. korn96

    korn96 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,624
    1
    Mar 3, 2013
    people that hate PPV will complain about any fight been a PPV.
     
  6. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,434
    1,010
    Mar 6, 2011
    This just goes to show just how strong this current HW scene really is when the 5th best hw against the 10th best hw is considered a monster ppv fight.
     
  7. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    I had no problem with Froch - Kessler being a PPV.

    Just because you talk **** outside of the ring does not make you a PPV fighter. If that is the case Derry Matthews should be a multi-millionaire.
     
  8. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,865
    Apr 19, 2010
    so which fight is ? whats good for one is good for the other :yep sky should have thought about it before bowing to a moany ass *****
     
  9. glue glove

    glue glove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,517
    3
    Jun 9, 2010
    I need a good undercard to buy it, but for the casuals it is a easy sell, probably easier than Haye-Harrison.
     
  10. korn96

    korn96 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,624
    1
    Mar 3, 2013
    that's not why its a PPV though is it? its a PPV because its one of the biggest fights that could be made in the UK. Its a fight between our two top HW's both of who are highly rated by rankings agencies.
     
  11. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    Quigg - Frampton should be PPV then?

    The fight shouldn't just be big in the UK, it should be big worldwide. This isn't.

    People are being taken for mugs.
     
  12. Mufc30

    Mufc30 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,629
    1
    Jan 28, 2013
    Who said it was?
    Fck off trolling
     
  13. shrek

    shrek New Member Full Member

    74
    0
    Apr 22, 2012
    Not worthy in my opinion, my reason: i'm paying £10 a month for Boxnation and for that i'll have mayweather vs canelo!!!. £20 a month for sky and i get decent domestic fights plus world level fights... Haye hasn't fought in a year
     
  14. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    Nothing is ppv worthy, you've already paid for skysports/boxnation. Why on earth would you pay twice?
    Anyway, even if that were not true, this fight certainly wouldn't be worth the expense.
     
  15. I Shot JR

    I Shot JR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,621
    1,765
    Feb 17, 2012
    I'd have paid £15 for Amir Khan vs. John Prescott. 50/50 fight in my opinion.