Hearn is fully justified in making Groves-Froch PPV

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by USSR Rob, Jul 23, 2013.

  1. KermitTheFrog

    KermitTheFrog Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2,095
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Trust everyone else, they really aren't! There is no clause anywhere that says the boxers involved in the biggest possible domestic fight must earn a minimum of £15m.
     
  2. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    15,873
    Likes Received:
    674
    All I mean is in comparison to haye v chisora or haye v Harrison at least there two world class exciting fighters in this fight, ppv is optional to everyone so you make up your own mind if it's value for money before you buy it
     
  3. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    15,873
    Likes Received:
    674
    I'd much rather pay ppv to watch froch v groves than khan v brook all day long
     
  4. tofu2009

    tofu2009 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    978
    Likes Received:
    1
    Do you think they will have two PPV's within a couple of months of each other?
     
  5. Josephd86

    Josephd86 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe so Billy, I just personally think that Khan Brook will be our biggest WW fight ever when it happens!
     
  6. Josephd86

    Josephd86 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's already been said that the fight is at least a year away. A lot can change. If Khan beats Alexander (I believe so) I think it will be huge
     
  7. Journey Man

    Journey Man Journeyman always. Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,943
    Likes Received:
    2,116
    Haye vs Fury is a 100x bigger and Tyson is getting a couple million, no where near 10 never mind 15 million.
     
  8. Sonny1

    Sonny1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    4,308
    Likes Received:
    4,165
    Agreed 100%
     
  9. troy

    troy Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    2,291
    Likes Received:
    37
    WTF 20m each get the **** outa here more like 1.5m for groves froch will be on more around the 2.5m mark....you guys are just plucking figures outta the air.
     
  10. Mufc30

    Mufc30 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2013
    Messages:
    3,629
    Likes Received:
    1
    No We arent, the op starter is lol

    I think your figures are rather generous too though, i would have said around half each of what you think
     
  11. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,158
    Likes Received:
    2
    :lol: at some of the responses on here. Could it be possible that the OP is pulling your legs with the $15-20 million comment? :nut
     
  12. Stuarty

    Stuarty Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    15
    Khan V Brook is a much bigger fight
     
  13. Rhodesie9

    Rhodesie9 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    1,172
    Likes Received:
    1
    The ppv argument is very interesting, what criteria should it be judged on?....titles at stake,whether you rate the boxers skills,nationality,do you like em as characters...past fights etc etc!!!!!With some of those in mind surely Carl and George is a good buy whereas some others might not be.I don't believe either of these lads will see more than one ,one point five mill and I am not convinced that some of these fights have to be ppv to meet the boxers fees....what about sponsorship,tv rights and ticket sales?
     
  14. KermitTheFrog

    KermitTheFrog Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2,095
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Yeah, the no world title belts they'd be fighting for confirms your point.
     
  15. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    11,403
    Likes Received:
    3
    Belts are for holding your trousers up.

    Both are big big fights.