I watch world champions. Most ****s like you on this forum don't even know who Allakhierdiev is lol. I was obviously exaggerating a little , Ive heard the name but never seen him fight, why should I have seen him fight, I'm not from the USA, he isn't a world champion, he isn't even a top prospect and hasn't even been in a eliminator. Who is Terence Crawford? who is he??? just like you HE'S A NOBODY
So you dont watch people because they are from the USA what kinda boxing fan are you, the guy ****ed up Prescott who ****ed up Khan and he looks legit He is a top prospect lol, why come on a boxing forum if you only watch casual fights, you think Senchenko is legit because he beat Hatton lol you probably didnt even know Hatton retired before the fight
Khan ? Prescott??? Lol prescotts a journeyman and khan is a glass jawed ftaud. I'm a hardcore fan that knows much more than you probably, but there isn't enough time to watch every ****ing prospect especially when they are from a country which overhypes their frauds.. he'll probably just be another danny jacobs, seth mitchell, jeff lacy, etc etc ... he'll probably just be a fraud just like them I'll see the guy if he fights for a world title. I watch domestic fights from my country that's all but yanks like you on here don't even watch world champions from europe lol you think people from the other side of the world have all the time to watch some ****ing prospect called ' terence crawford' cause he beat up the journeyman prescott lol
Im from England dumbass How can you know more about boxing than me when you dont even know who Crawford is, if you saw him you would know hes legit you probably didnt watch Rigondeaux til the Donaire fight If your from England aswell then our country hypes our fighters like no other so dunno what your talking about Stick to thinking Senchenko beats Ortiz and Brook because he beat Hatton
crawford needs a belt for status and/or legitimacy at 135. broner isn't possible. against abril and vasquez (who have belts) but it's going to be tricky making these fights. hbo may not want to buy this fight, but if they do and it ends up being a stinker, win or lose, crawford's stock goes down. so his best option after gamboa is ricky burns, then either abril or vasquez.....then ji hoon kim. edit* just found out burns is fighting beltran, so burns as option for crawford is out.
danny Jacobs far from fraud just got through cancer he is still to be determined an is not in same breath as Mitchell ,an although lacy did not reach were most thought he was a world champ Crawford on other hand not over hyped most fair weather mainstream fight fans know nothing bout him there for how can you say over hyped he is solid prospect ready for next big step
If you´re not interested in Crawford yet, why do you bother posting here ? Just to talk down US-fighters and hyping Eastern Euros ?
'I think Broner would murder him right now. Crawford still has a HUGE defensive hole on his left side. He needs to face a few very fast but not so powerful opponents first, so this gets worked out. Broner would counter Crawford's big looping left with ease. It would be a very short fight.
This one would be interesting. I'd love to see Crawford moved up fast. A Gamboa fight could be his ticket to the big time! If he wins.
idk who he will fight but top rank wont put him in there yet with gamboa. crawford isnt ready for gamboa. crawford hasnt even done 12 rds yet. crawford cant even beat abril right now . and if hbo dont like guys like rigo it wouldnt be smart to throw him in there with gamboa or abril. boring fights written all over it. but the shafikov guy top rank just signed would actually be a good fight for him then after that either gamboa,abril, or vasquez.