Is Andre Ward REALLY #2 P4P?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MartyMaar, Aug 9, 2013.

  1. MartyMaar

    MartyMaar Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    7
    If you had to convince me of his genius in the ring WITH ONE FIGHT, which one would it be?

    Because I'm having a hard time putting JMM at #3.

    Juan Manuel Marquez came up from 126....He's a warrior....He defeated the monstrous Pacquiao in legendary fashion...He obviously takes his career VERY seriously and is dedicated.

    What has Andre Ward done in comparison?

    I believe moving up/down in weight is one of ways to tell who's really P4P.
    And I'm reading Andre Ward hasn't done much besides being a super middleweight...sooo.........
    :bart
     
  2. MannySteward

    MannySteward Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,660
    Likes Received:
    4
    Well. Ward has cleaned out a very solid division.

    Not many people in boxing have done that.

    He doesn't lose many rounds either.
     
  3. Flyers2001

    Flyers2001 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,391
    Likes Received:
    2
    P4P is a mythical ranking based on the notion of two fighters being the same size using their giving skill set.

    Moving up and down in weight should have nothing to do with P4P rankings. It should be based on opponents faced at any giving weight and rising/falling skill sets. How would fighter A do against fighter B if they were equal in size.

    Its mythical fun, but has its place among ranking fighters for today's purposes and historical.

    With that said Ward's inactivity may well catch up to him when ranking right now. Marquez's huge win can sure propel him to #2 and he follows it up with a win against another top 10 p4p in Bradley it should solidify him and #2, or if Mayweather some how loses moving him to possibly #1. Which would then create a huge argument in the fact that Mayweather thoroughly embarrassed Marquez when they fought. It makes for good debates.
     
  4. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    23,723
    Likes Received:
    4,048
    He's AT LEAST #2 in Oakland :deal
     
  5. Big Ears

    Big Ears Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Possibly, hard to establish anymore seeing as he never fights.
     
  6. MartyMaar

    MartyMaar Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    7

    Moving up and down weight kinda helps in projecting how good someone will be at an even higher weight.

    If Marquez went from 126 to 147, it can be surmised that given a slightly larger frame....well, let me cut the foreplay...

    If Marquez was a tad bigger...(opposite for Andre Ward)....who would win that fight?

    Is Andre Ward as elusive as Mayweather?
     
  7. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    17,492
    Likes Received:
    11,185
    He is the undisputed king of his division. There is literally no question that
    he is the best SMW. Other than Wlad, point to another division where the top
    guy holds that dominance? (Floyd excluded as he's # 1)
     
  8. MartyMaar

    MartyMaar Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    7

    All that would really mean is that he's #1 in that division.

    I could point to Guillermo Rigondeaux as I don't see anyone in HIS division EVER beating him.
     
  9. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    17,492
    Likes Received:
    11,185
    That is true, I forgot about Rigo. But do you see any LHW's or CW'S
    beating Ward at this point in time (semi-retirement excluded). And Rigo's
    a real little guy, I don't see him pulling a Manny, Marquez, Morales,
    etc....cant see him higher than FW
     
  10. Ahurath

    Ahurath Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Messages:
    5,270
    Likes Received:
    246
    He cleaned out a very solid divison then goes out to outclass THE nr 1 guy at the divison above him.

    Go figure.
     
  11. MartyMaar

    MartyMaar Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    7
    Me neither, he's probably set for life at FW.

    But similarly, Andre Ward may only be effective at SMW. I was just reading that Chris Byrd piece on how losing weight affected his game.

    :deal
     
  12. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,121
    Likes Received:
    22
    Is beating Kessler, Froch, Bika, Abraham and Dawson enough to be rated number 2 though?

    Great wins are Froch and Kessler.

    Good wins over Bika, Abraham( loses some credibility because of the Froch and Dirrell defeats.) and Dawson good win at 168 LBS, Great at 175 LBS.

    I would rate Ward highly based on how well he performed in these fights, surprisingly Bika was the most competitive.

    Marquez has a long career of fighting at world level and just scored a knockout over a top 3 P4P rated fighter I think he deserves the 2nd spot.
     
  13. witschnerd1

    witschnerd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ward's skill level is what makes him #2 in most P4P ratings. He is a master at distance and ring generalship. Only Floyd and maybe Rigo have more raw talent and skill.
     
  14. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    17,255
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ward done almost nothing in the other wight classes so he should not be classified at the p4p list
     
  15. mick557

    mick557 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    5
    No. #1