How do you feel about Roy jones?

:rofl "HA!" Even a blind man can see I've effortlessly and brutally fukking destroyed your boyfriend Mind Reader you clueless deluded waffling freak. Medication time for you indeed.

After being brutally exposed and humiliated by General Sod, bailey, myself, Rico, and Foxy in one single thread, laughing stock Loudon ran off to nurse his wounds, devastated, and still can't bear to rejoin the debates :hi:.

 

Huh? Why isn't he a Top5 p4p all time?

 

Have some time on my hands, so I thought I would destroy this **** poor comparisson...

Mosley lost to Cotto, Cotto lost to Margarito, Mosley BEAT Margarito.. Mosley was the man though he had previously lost to Cotto.

Foreman lost to Holyfield, Holyfield lost to Moorer, Foreman BEAT Moorer.. Foreman was the man even though he had previously lost to Holy..

Now ill play in your fantasy land, and show you what would have to happen for your spaceboy analogy to have any relevance...

Gonzalez lost to Jones, Jones lost to DM, Gonzalez BEAT DM.. Gozo was the man, though he had previously lost to Jones...

Now you see, we are missing a major link, of Jones losing to DM.. See the circumstances are way different.. In this case we have a fighter that happened to be the best P4P fighter in the world, who vacated his belts to win a HW title, and dropped back down and reclaimed most of them..

This is actually the real line..

Tarver lost to Jones, Jones lost to Tarver, Hopkins BEAT Tarver, and it is a much more suitible for your example above.. Being as Tarver was the man even though he had previously lost to Jones, because he beat Jones. Hopkins was also the man for beating Tarver, though he had previously lost to Jones...

Any of this sinking in yet? Or do you need more?

 

**** poor clueless attempt at fanboy rationalization. Way to completely miss the whole fukking point. If you had half a brain it would be intentional. Is that really the best you can do ?

Your whole argument was Jones had beat Gonzalez.

Gonzalez was Lineal, though he'd lost to title holder Jones.
Mosley was Lineal, though he'd lost to title holder Cotto.
Jones & Cotto weren't even part of the fukking Lineage

Here's another; De La Hoya was also Lineal @ 154lbs, though he'd lost to Mosley a weight lower, who wasn't part of the Lineage and had moved up.

You're nonsensical rationalizations don't even come into it. ffs man that was a weak attempt .

I've easily destroyed every **** attempt at arguing a point that you can come up with. ****-easy. Try harder.

 

Come on you dense ******, how many times do I have to tell you that I am talking about "the man" and the man isn't always lineal..

Yes, Jones was the man, for holding major titles, the ring belt, and already held a dominating win over Gonzalez.. Yes Gonzo was lineal... He had not beat anyone that beat Jones, as both Foreman and Mosley did over the man that beat them...I have proven that your examples hold no weight..

ok:huh

You are ****ing delusional, anyone can see that I have raped your silly argument.. Now I have to work.. Later Joseph.:smooch

 

In my examples, Lineal WAS "the man" you complete and utter fukking ******! Jesus you're dumb. My examples fukkin DESTROY your whole argument, yet you have to remain in denial now and stick with your claim of Roid being the man - WHICH HOLDS NO WEIGHT.

Mind Reader is staggering around in a hole he's dug for himself.

Still confused? Good. Being a fukkin ****** you it must be a common problem for you.

My argument KILLED yours, as usual.

I have butt-fukked you repeatedly in this thread. Fact. Now run along wimp, because I'll be here to destroy you and your clueless fanboy nonsense every time you return.

 

Ill just repost this.. proves. without a doubt your examples are not comparable... owned again.

 

I though you were leaving wimp?

Mind Reader is stuttering around on ***** street, indecisive and confused.

His shitty weak argument has been proven useless and irrelevant, just like him, and he's got no more ideas left. He's stuck in his hole, having humiliated and owned himself yet again.

Joe Boxer wins again.

 

A really specialt fighter glad I witnessed him during my lifetime.
Same goes to Floyd, Wladimir and Pac tbh.

All three especially Wlad with all the hate he's getting will be recognized as the true champions of this era in 5-10 years after they quit.

 

You are the idiot claiming that Gonzalez was the man and not Roy Jones.:rofl

Comedy ****ing gold.

 

Your butt-hurt is strong. Love it.

Gonzalez had the FAR stronger claim than Jones. Fact.

You are the fukking idiot for still denying this when you have been completely schooled and know you're wrong. I guess the fact that, being a clueless brainwashed fanboy, you believed otherwise for so long must be a bitter pill for you to swallow.

Still, at least you've dropped your other **** weak irrelevant strawman arguments.

 

Humiliated? Ha! I haven't responded because I'm away. Enjoy yourself til I come back.

 

If you believe Gonzalez was the man to beat instead of Roy Jones I will let you have it..

But if Gonzalez was the man, then you need to stay true to that line, and not ditch it just because your boy Joe Calzaghe enters the picture..:deal

Joe's claim to greatness at LHW was the lineage that came from beating Roy.. so if Roy wasn't the man, then neither was Tarver, Hopkins or Joe..

Delusional fanboy.:rofl

 

huh? Calzaghe? Nope. Been discussed to death. Off topic.

No ****.

Yes you are, whereas I just call it how it is, which is why I'm so highly regarded yet upset so many fanboys and haters alike.

 

Nope, on topic, as a few pages back in one of your posts Hopkins magically became the man after beating Tarver, convenient that he fought Joe next huh?

No, you twist and squrim like a little worm that is about to be eaten by an American robin.:deal