Has anyone even considered that Hatton beat the man at 140 lb and was a legit lineal champ and P4P top 5 fighter for some time.
Its not looking that way. He was undefeated in his weight class and fought every one worth fighting within it too. Froch as much as he has to be admired, hasnt done that.
Hatton was a very, very limited fighter who had a short self-live as his fighting style did not allow him to have an extended career. He might have been more of a 'man to the people' but if you look at their careers based on their fights Froch wins every time.
:rofl For a man ive read on here deriding people for their (in his opinion) lack of intellect, to come out with that. Shelf life?
My apologies, am normally in a rush when posting during the day as I'm at work and rarely check my posts. When you get off the dole you'll know what I mean.
Yet you crucify, belittle and abuse posters who do the same thing hahaha Honestly your hypocrisy holds no bounds does it. Keep posting, your a funny characer
Ok, will do. Hopefully it wont be too long until I come off it, after all, the dole itself has a limited 'self live'.
Beyond me mate. I wish he never demanded the Pac fight, his stock would be so much higher. Even with the Mayweather defeat he was a class fighter, the Malignaggi win showed that. Its as if Hatton is some bum when clearly every single publication on both sides of the Atlantic rated Hatton as one of the best fighters on the planet between 2005 and 2008. Maybe I was dreaming it all up.
Froch is a seriously good fighter but he is not and never will be the #1 in his weight class. Hatton was for some time and beat THE man to do so.
I totally agree, the Pac fight was just all wrong for him, the camp, the trainer, all of it. As you said he was the best in his division for a long time and that is what matters. The only men to beat him in his main career were the widely seen as p4p 1 and 2, what an achievement and they werent even his weight.