Chris Arreola vs. Seth Mitchell: who will win?

if banks didn't beat up mitchell so badly in the first fight i think most would see this as a pickem fight.but we seen what happen.theres no denying the fact that mitchells chin isn't very solid.but i have a different insight on the first banks fight.mitchell got hurt by a big shot and never really recovered.he was hurt and mentally lost.he faught banks waaaaay to nervous and if he does that with areola it's over pretty quick.for the second fight i didn't think mitchell would be able to come back against banks mentally strong enough to win it.i thought banks ruined him.i still think mentally he's damaged goods but this is a different fighter now with a totaly different style.i think areola is made to order for mitchell.i think if he goes into the fight with a fu** it this is it mentality... he stops areola in 4 or 5 rounds.i know areola's licking his chops and thats why he's gonna got hurt badly against michell.

thats all

 

arreola has this.

 

seth mitchell was the great black hope
he got exposed as a bum
so quit talking about him
why make threads about bums

 

You talk like he's not a top 30 ranked fighter - whether you like it or not. Get lost troll/boring poster. You could have at least made that statement with some wit.

 

seth mitchell is as poor as they come

 

aint trolling so the truth must hurt
he is awful
arreola will belly bounce that bum into retirement

 

I have nothing against Seth. He comes across as decent and intelligent guy in the interviews I've seen but the guy does not like getting hit. He panics and looks badly shaken up each time a clean punch lands. I don't rate Arreola that highly but one thing you can't deny is that the guy is tough.

Mitchell's done well for a guy who got into the sport so late and he's dedicated but there's only so much you can learn at 30.

Arreola hits hard and that can only mean one thing for Seth. KO in 4. Would like to be proven wrong but I don't see it.

 

The truth? So if Mitchell is a bum, then what was Ibragimov?

I don't think Mitchell is a top 10 fighter and I think he loses to Arreola, but idiots that spout off on these boards about how guys not in the top 3 are bums and don't belong in the same ring as the other guy are trolls. That's the truth.

So, Mitchell will retire after this fight? Glad to hear it.

 

based on merit alone Mitchell is crap. He just happens to be with GBP. He is Glass Jawed and has very little skill. Total hype who has already been found out. That is just being real.

 

Who are you comparing him to? Ali? Or do you think he gets smoked by the entire top 20 in boxing today?

 

his best win is Witherspoon, Inragimov or Banks who starched him in 2 rounds. That is not impressive. Mitchell is a manufactured fighter. Like I said on merit he is lucky to be top 25. Where the hell are Witherspoon, Banks, and Ibragimov right now? They are irrelevant.

I have nothing against Mitchell personally he just isn't a prizefighter.

 

Well you're an idiot fan if you can't figure out that his win over Ibragimov was clearly and obviously his best of those three, or you haven't watched his fights.

I guess it gets back to my original point that for some of the clowns on here, if you're not a champ then you're some sort of bum or terrible fighter.

 

I named his 3 'best' wins as in reality all 3 are not very good wins in reality. Someone that hasn't seen him fight would not be able to name 3 would they? :roflatsch

Been watching the sport almost 30 years and have seen this story before. Sounds like it is you who doesn't know what they are talking about. Mitchell has been coddled and carefully moved and after Banks sparked him even Golden Boy doesn't care anymore Arreola is going to **** him.

 

What did you like best about his win over Banks? And what's your definition of ****?

Forget it, I won't humiliate you since you pulled the age card.