Incompetent judge from Pac vs Bradley selected as Canelo v Mayweather judge! WTF?????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RafaelGonzal, Sep 4, 2013.



  1. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,846
    12
    Mar 7, 2006
    The incompetent, C. J. ROSS who scored the Pac vs Bradley fight for Bradley, has somehow been selected to judge Canelo vs Mayweather? this inept individual is female Im told, regardless she should never be let near a ring again, during her lifetime. How can someone so clearly incompetent get selected to judge a fight of this magnitude?????

    What the **** is going on? the fix is in, how could this happen? its a ****ing travesty, **** this event, its lost all credibility for me unless there is a KO

    HOW COULD THIS INCOMPETENT PIECE OF GARBAGE EVER JUDGE A FIGHT AGAIN, **** GOLDENBOY AND THE CROOKS IN VEGAS THE FIX IS IN DONT EXPECT A FAIR DECISION.
     
  2. stitches

    stitches Member Full Member

    110
    0
    May 6, 2012
    Canelo needs a knockout anyways...
     
  3. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,238
    9
    Dec 11, 2012
    In who's favor are they going to fix the fight?
     
  4. P.M.

    P.M. Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,908
    0
    May 31, 2012
    Since Bradley was the underdog, I'd say fix for canelo. But in that fight it didn't make since to fix it for Bradley, there was nothing to gain form Bradley winning. It was just plain bad judging form him. So lets hope he has his glasses cleaned with a fresh prescription.

    This is a fight I don't believe will be hard to judge, if mayweather performs it will be a clear UD. I don't see canelo winning unless he can beat/ruff up mayweather or get the ko. But I believe there is more to gain form a canelo win then a mayweather win, so if the fix is in its Canelos favor.
     
  5. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,238
    9
    Dec 11, 2012
    Don't you need a lot of clout to fix a fight of this magnitude? It would seem that Mayweather has more clout in Vegas here. He is a Vegas resident and makes a ton of money for the city. Hell, they delayed his jail sentence so he could fight.
     
  6. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,846
    12
    Mar 7, 2006
    the highlight of the night will be the reading of those cards. The minute you hear split decision, the fix is in and something controversial is going down, remember that on fight night.
     
  7. P.M.

    P.M. Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,908
    0
    May 31, 2012
    In a fight like this I would like to think we get fair judging. I don't think they want to repeat the Bradley PAC fiasco. You would think in a close fight mayweather would get the nod, but a lot of times they like to give the younger fighter the nod. At this point mayweather is worth too much money to rob him or give a close decision to the other guy. So I think you're right there.
     
  8. ACS

    ACS Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,862
    0
    Jul 7, 2013
    Canelo SD
     
  9. pushthrough

    pushthrough Guest

    It's sad that she's one of the judges
    Wouldn't be surprised if someone paid her off again to fix the fight in favor of one of the fighters
     
  10. MonkeyEarMuffs

    MonkeyEarMuffs Dynamite Upper! Full Member

    593
    4
    Nov 14, 2009
    This gets worse every day... Reeks, this reeks of shenanigans.
     
  11. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,846
    12
    Mar 7, 2006
    think of it this way if you rob Mayweather you get the chance for a trilogy the rematch would be twice as huge and the final test to see who is best would also be huge, PPV wins, Vegas wins, Golden Boy wins and the fighters would each get a huge windfall. Think about it who is left out there for Mayweather to make huge amounts of dollars against besides Pac, who he wont fight or guys like Golovkin or Maravilla also guys Mayweather wont fight. Think about it, a robbery makes sense $$$$.
     
  12. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,542
    5,269
    Dec 1, 2007
    He wasn't the only judge to score it for Bradley, hence the reason Pac lost. It isn't the judges fault that Pac had a hard time hitting Bradley all night. **** all you sore ******* losers lol. It was an either way fight. Video analysis of the fight supports the judges who gave Bradley the victory. He outlanded Pac in more rounds, than vice versa.
     
  13. P.M.

    P.M. Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,908
    0
    May 31, 2012
    You put it that way, yeah I can see it.
     
  14. DABOZ

    DABOZ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,759
    0
    Mar 5, 2012

    Guaranteed there will be a rematch. It's about the MONEY.
     
  15. DABOZ

    DABOZ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,759
    0
    Mar 5, 2012
    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...iew-pacquiao-vs-bradley-bout-favored-pacquiao

    All five judges tasked by the World Boxing Organization (WBO) to review the controversial Manny Pacquiao vs. Timothy Bradley fight were unanimous in declaring Pacquiao the winner after analyzing the video of the fight.

    The result of the five judges' review was made available to RingTV on Wednesday.

    In a poll posted by CSNBayArea.com, among 53 media people who covered or watched the fight, 50 of them said Pacquiao won the fight, while just three said Bradley was the winner.

    In another poll, HBO Sports reported 91 percent of those who viewed the Pacquiao vs. Bradley fight said Pacquiao won, while only seven percent believed Bradley was the victor and two percent deemed it a draw (via InsideSports).


    check your facts. YDKSAB