Because they're European. Bitter Americans can't take the fact that there are no good American heavyweights. I find it funny how they call Klitschkos and the modern heavyweight era "****" because there are no good American heavyweights... yet what does that say about American boxing? That even in a supposed "**** era" the best they can come up with is Tony Thompson...
Holmes was younger and went on to achieve much more than 2002 Mercer. 4 years after his loss to Tyson , Holmes beat prime undefeated Mercer and should of been world champ , nut Mercer's title was not on the line. Holmes then took Hokyfield the distance who would of handed Wlad his ass. He then had a very close fight with MaCall who had just shatterd Lewis in 2. Lewis would of also handed Wlad his ass. What did shot to **** 2002 Mercer , whose best years were the early 90's do after his loss to Wlad? The comparsion is ****.
really so which part of your post here is asking a question - please be specific as to where the question or question mark is, because otherwise its a statement that ONLY YOU provided and not a question, it doesn't even quote where the OP has said Tyson beat a prime Holmes (because he didn't say it). You then tried to pass off your error as my fault in not understanding your wrong English - I can see why you didn't quote me, such was the magnitude of your error.
What did being European have to do with it when America and HBO treated K2 like their own and built them up to be the face of HW boxing? Your post says you started watching boxing last year.
the Americans are not pretending that they have great HW boxers. Whereas Klitlickers are. see the difference?
So missing punctuation is the cause of your ignorance? That's a clarifying statement giving him the oppurtunity to correct any missunderstanding. It was made in direct response to an unclear response and wouldn't demand a question mark.... I can't believe I have to debate grammar rather than the substance of posts.
good, that's a question, whereas 'missing punctuation is the cause of your ignorance!' is a statement. glad you are getting there. its not clarifying at all, they are words you put in the OPs mouth so that you could win a construed argument to make up for losing the actual argument with the OP. you didn't even quote him, so much for a direct response. then learn not to pass your mistakes off as grammar errors.
I'm glad that most of your 1600 posts are nonsensical garbage, if you can't understand what a clarifying statement is or the fact that a direct response need not quote directly the post it's related to then I have no more time to waste with you. have a nice day
tell us all again how Wlad beating a faded contender like Mercer is equivalent to Tyson beating a past prime heavyweight great again please
you aren't quoting others because you know you are incapable of replying with a valid argument as you've shown. But people have you sussed.
:rofl "wladmir beating mercer is the same as tyson beating holmes (even though holmes outboxed mercer years after the tyson loss) but still the wins mean the same" - klitfan logic atsch
shut your limey ass and stop talking about US and HBO ,coz you know **** about it ,you're toothless ,brainless and prob glass jawed paqi just like harol, davo and many other morons from United Kingdumb.
Paqistani guy taliking about fighting , my grandma would shatter your stinky glass jaw and I'm sure most american girls would beat the crap outta you ! btw listen to angel garcia , listen to what he said about your people and fighting .