My controversial belief..... IMO Bradley beat Pacquiao

In the first two rounds Bradley controled Pac with effective jabs and body shots the only real work Pacquiao did was in the last 15/20 seconds the rest of the round was Pac following Bradley getting touched with jabs and body punches.if I'm dictating the entire round and you land 2 good shots at the end that doesn't negate the fact I won the rest of the round at no point was Bradley badly hurt by a shot so those 1/2 harder shots that actually land don't override the work already put in.

 

No ****! Nobody knew that! Man what a discovery you've made. But neither Bradley, nor most of the people who watched the fight care about the "official score".

 

This is an example of exactly why the juantards and *****s who share their scores are not even worth reading and carry zero weight since 99% of the population know pacquiao clearly beat bradley. :happy

He even scored 4 and 6 for Bradley.

 

No way Bradley beat Pac Man... I mean no way!

Pac Man won at least 8 rounds in that fight, with about 2 even.

 

Even the ringside announcers admit they gave those two rounds to Pacquiao based solely off the little flurries he threw in the last few seconds replay clearly shows almost all of those punches missing I watched the fight again last night I wish somebody would post the fight in the thread that way maybe i can see what you saw.

 

6 pages? really?

 

I JUST rewatched those two rounds. Go on youtube to rewatch those rounds and I'd really like to know how you can give those two rounds to Bradley. It wasn't just some little flurries, but if you want to think that's all that happened in those rounds, I will guarantee you there was less from Bradley (he was missing a ton too and/or blocked by Pac).

 

You're not the only one, I've had Bradley winning that fight since the first time I saw it live.

 

had it 8-2 by the 10th. but due to my shitty streaming, i just gave my 11th and 12th to juan, coz I love him so much.

8-4 bradley UD

 

I'm not sure if you were referring to round 1/2 or 4/6 but per your request I just watched the first two over again. The second round was closer but the aggressor for the whole round was Bradley Pacquiao landed a few good straights but Bradley kept him off balance. for the first round all you need to due is watch the start of the second round when they say the combo he threw at the end bailed him out in a round he was losing,


I just realize your thing says Sept 2013 are you just trolling/an alt or something

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkuJnRnMjiY

No.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJF1uPKa4SQ

No.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JXO-RZL-KE

Yeah, still No.

EDIT:
Well not unless you consider punching the arms and gloves as "clean and effective punching", and hitting the body of your opponent less than half of how much he hit you in the face with power shots as "effective aggression", then yeah, you might make a case.

 

I'm talking 4 & 6. Rewatch those rounds and give me your reason on why you think Bradley won.

 

:goodjust

Hahaha all you have to do is look at 1 min of the first video to see the story of this whole fight last 15 secs of the round Pac tries to do something. Listen in at 55 secs into the clip (bailed him out a round he was losing).

 

You know what you're right!

Just kidding.

No.

 

Dude fighters lose and he loss again at 1.55 point they mention again "last minute syndrome" fighting the last 20 seconds of rounds I mean look at your video its just Pacquiao highlights and it start at the last 20 of round 1 skip to a highlight of one punch in round 3 and then skip to one body shot in round 6 Pacquiao dominated that fight but in a Pacquiao highlight video he only has 3 good shots they could fine in 6 rounds. Live I had it 8-4 Pacquiao EVERYTIME I watched the fight after I get the same score 7-5 Bradley. How about posting the whole fight I don't know the rules but its been over a year since it happened and I've seen full old school fights on here before